上海娱乐地图 – 上海后花园论坛-上海419论坛-夜上海论坛-阿拉爱上海

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience： the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive

　　Recently, Changan Qiyuan E07, which has attracted much attention from users, launched its first public test and conducted a full live broadcast on the section from Changan Automobile Global R & D Center to Dianjiang Proving Ground. The test was personally led by Zhu Huarong, Chairperson of Changan Automobile, and Wang Jun, President of Changan Automobile. They became product experience officers and witnessed the hard-core strength of Changan Qiyuan E07 in the fields of intelligent driving technology, intelligent cockpit interaction, and vehicle dynamic performance with users watching online, allowing users to see the actual use scenarios. Changan Qiyuan E07 gives strong support for safe and intelligent travel.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image001

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image002

　　The smart driving system is unique, we all have what you have.

　　Changan Qiyuan E07 is Changan’s first model to officially enter the field of end-to-end large-scale model smart driving. In this event, the "experience officers" launched smart driving tests from expressways, urban expressways and Dianjiang Proving Ground, demonstrating the unique technical strength of Changan Smart Driving and verifying whether Qiyuan E07 can bring users a diverse scene intelligent driving experience.

　　The high-speed road section mainly tests the traffic efficiency of the vehicle intelligent driving system and the quality of lane change decision-making during high-speed driving. In the face of large traffic flow, the high-speed intelligent pilot assistance equipped with Qiyuan E07 shows a unique response ability, which can quickly judge the lane change to a high traffic efficiency lane, effectively avoid congestion, avoid scratches, and eliminate user tension. When getting off the ramp, when there is a slow car in the far right lane, Qiyuan E07 can autonomously surpass the slow car according to the traffic situation, allowing users to obtain a smoother travel speed and directly avoid various potential safety risks. When encountering construction roadblocks or near-stop obstacles ahead, Qiyuan E07 can identify and actively change lanes in advance without any mistakes.

　　The most satisfactory thing is that in the face of the deviation and lane change of the cart, the Qiyuan E07 can be laterally away from the cart, and it can also accelerate and decelerate away from the parallel cart to determine whether the car behind is offset. Like a mind-reading skill, it can always understand the driver’s mind. There is also a unique car escort and mountain road IACC, which protects the safety of users’ travel at all times, adding unlimited possibilities for users’ exploration and travel. As Changan Junge said, "The intelligent driving system developed by Changan Automobile fully meets people’s cultural expectations for long-term peace."

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image003

　　The urban expressway is mainly complex and changeable, which mainly tests the risk prevention ability and game ability of the vehicle intelligent driving system, which is also closer to the user’s daily car scene. After testing the road section, Chang’an Junge said that Changan intelligent driving starts from the details and makes the long board play to the extreme. He said: "Changan intelligent driving is unique, and safety is the first mission." The IACC intelligent cruise assistance carried by Qiyuan E07 can follow the trajectory of the previous car or keep it in the middle of the lane, just like an old driver. It is worth mentioning that Qiyuan E07 will also launch the industry’s only remote parking integration function on OTA in December 2024, which will effectively reduce the user’s operating costs. In the event of a small parking space or inconvenient operation, the user can activate the remote parking, parking and moving functions through the mobile APP with one click, enjoying unimaginable convenience.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image004

　　All-excellent hardware is unique, fully equipped with hard control full scene

　　After the intelligent driving test in the morning, the dynamic test drive in the afternoon still posed a rigorous test to the Changan Qiyuan E07. Zhu Huarong, chairperson of Changan Automobile, and Wang Jun, president of Changan Automobile, respectively experienced the high ring, basic performance track, and comprehensive performance track. During the test, the Changan Tianheng intelligent chassis carried by Changan Qiyuan E07 showed delicate quality, which was praised by drivers and the audience in the live stream. This chassis system adopts the front double fork arm + rear H arm all-aluminum alloy independent suspension design, and the parts are made of aluminum alloy. The overall lightweight is 30%, the stiffness is increased by more than 20%, and the overall response is more sensitive. When cornering, the front double wisharm suspension provides greater lateral stiffness, enabling the vehicle to grip more firmly and prevent rolling; in the face of a bumpy road surface, the rear H-arm multi-link suspension exhibits excellent impact resistance, effectively absorbing road impact, providing better vehicle stability and handling.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image005

　　Not only that, Changan Qiyuan E07 is also equipped with a CDC + air spring intelligent magic carpet suspension. This system can not only automatically adjust the damping according to the road conditions, but also bring more balanced comfort and handling stability to the driver through the performance of "moderate softness and hardness". Moreover, it also has a high and low adjustment range of up to 90mm, which can automatically adjust the lifting height for different speeds. The intelligent performance of both softness and hardness and height can be adjusted, which undoubtedly makes the driver more relaxed and confident to face various complex road conditions.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image006

　　In addition, the excellent NVH performance of Changan Qiyuan E07 also impressed the users in the live stream. The quiet deep space NVH technology it uses has been optimized through the design of more than 100 NVH special projects such as double-layer sound insulation glass and ultra-quiet tires for the whole car, bringing a silent experience comparable to luxury cars. It has excellent noise control capabilities. The noise at 60km/h is only 55.8dB when driving through rough asphalt pavement, and the noise at 50km/h when passing through cement pavement is only 60.4dB. Even the upper high ring can provide excellent noise control to ensure that every person in the car can enjoy a quiet driving environment like a library.

　　The intelligent cockpit is unique, and deep human-vehicle interaction only needs to be moved

　　The innovation of Changan Qiyuan E07 is not only reflected in the industry leadership of smart driving, but also extends to the subversive experience of smart cockpit. In order to meet the higher expectations of the new generation of users for intelligence, Qiyuan E07 has created a subversive smart cockpit, bringing the industry’s first "one room, one living room and one terrace", multi-functional deformable trunk, electric partition glass, interstellar panoramic canopy + electric sunshade, etc., bringing users a unique cockpit atmosphere and opening a new chapter in future travel.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image007

　　In order to meet the individual needs of users in different scenarios, the Qiyuan E07 smart cockpit completes the cross-domain integration of more than 16 controllers such as body, power, chassis, air conditioning, and thermal management, bringing a variety of modes such as cinema mode, children mode, and sleep care, which greatly reduces the complexity of user operation. For example, when the user takes a lunch break in the car, he needs to adjust the seat, set the air conditioner temperature, and close the window. In the new car, simply turn on the nap mode, and the vehicle will automatically adjust the seat. At the same time, turn on the air conditioner and air purification, and turn off the door and interior ambient lights, allowing users to obtain a comfortable and personalized rest environment.

　　The much-praised camping mode also has a one-click camping function, the back door of the new car will automatically open, and put down the partition glass. The air conditioner and rear reading lights will also automatically turn on. Users can lie in the car to watch a starry sky, read a book, and enjoy their own world to the fullest. Users can also program the scene mode through the car machine or mobile APP according to their own needs, realize drag-and-drop scene programming, programmer-level scene programming, etc., and even program directly with voice commands to become the designer of their own life.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image008

　　In addition, the unique full-scene voice interaction technology of Qiyuan E07 shows super high friendliness and practicality, making the user’s driving comfort more comprehensive. The four-tone zone interaction in the car guarantees the full-space voice coverage in the car, and provides differentiated permissions and exclusive services according to different locations; the unique four-way interaction outside the car of the Changan brand perfectly realizes voice recognition without dead ends. Users can chat with their cars outside the car. The unique innovative technology truly realizes the seamless connection between people and cars. As Chang’an Junge said: "Changan Smart Driving truly realizes multi-instruction automatic speech recognition, and only moves the mouth throughout the process." With advanced AI large-scale model technology, Qiyuan E07 also supports multi-intention voice vehicle control, visible speech, and intelligent Q & A on the vehicle side, providing users with a more convenient and safe driving experience.

　　Changan Automobile refuses to take ideas, does difficult and correct things, insists on full-stack self-research in the field of intelligent driving, and is not afraid of many difficulties, and finally brings Changan Smart Driving to users. Changan Smart Driving is the latest achievement of the new energy "Shangri-La" plan and the intelligent "Beidou Tianshu" plan, and is an important measure of Changan Automobile’s third venture.

Changan Qiyuan E07 dynamic test drive experience: the more complex the road conditions, the more outstanding the smart drive _fororder_image009

　　Changan Smart Driving has broken through a number of technologies in environmental perception, decision planning, etc., and has fully confirmed the safety, reliability and stability through full-scene real vehicle testing and continuous algorithm iteration in high-speed, urban areas, mountain roads, rural roads, etc., bringing users a more personalized and customized intelligent driving experience. At present, Changan Smart Driving R & D team has more than 1,000 members, and the number of patents has exceeded 800. With such excellent performance, Changan Qiyuan E07, coupled with a reasonable price, I believe it will be able to meet the needs of more new generation families. In the future, Changan Qiyuan will continue to optimize the smart driving system, stand firmly in the first echelon of smart driving, and establish a new benchmark in the field of intelligent driving. (Source: Changan Qiyuan)

Blue Electric E5 PLUS official picture exposure： defining the new aesthetics of family travel

The stunning appearance of the official picture is like a visual feast, redefining a new aesthetic for family travel.

In appearance, the Blue Electric E5 PLUS makes a strong debut with a minimalist futuristic design style. The body color of Aurora Green is like a bright emerald, exuding a charming charm. The smooth lines outline an elegant and dynamic outline, and every detail has been carefully carved to show an unparalleled level of craftsmanship. Whether it is still or in motion, it is like a moving work of art, adding a nobility and style to family travel.

In terms of interior space, the Blue Electric E5 PLUS has shown extraordinary strength. The two flexible seat layouts of "Big Five Seats, Enjoy Seven Seats" meet the diverse needs of different families. The 3162mm effective space in the car, with a rate of up to 66.4%, provides a spacious and comfortable riding environment for the whole family.

The space of the seven-seat model is diverse, and the second and third rows of seats can be reclined to create a spacious rest area or huge storage space in an instant. One row of legroom is spacious, and the soufflé seat gives the driver the ultimate comfort experience. The second row of seats on the five-seat model can be adjusted to 119 °, allowing passengers to enjoy comfort and relaxation.

The official debut of the Blue Electric E5 PLUS marks the birth of a new aesthetics for family travel. As the pre-sale approaches at the end of September, it will surely lead the new trend of family travel with its unique charm, excellent performance and innovative design, bringing a better travel experience to families.

＂Edge Walker＂ released a new poster, Ren Xianqi and Ren Dahua

1905 movie network news A few days ago, the second round of advanced screening was officially announced, and the poster version of "Brotherhood" was released at the same time. The film was directed by a famous director and starred in,,,,, and tells the story of the black and white chaos on the eve of the return in 1997, the great change was imminent, the contradictions between multiple forces intensified, violent incidents occurred frequently, and the gang leader Lin Yaochang (played by Ren Dahua) entrusted the gang to his confidant A Luo (played by Ren Xianqi). A Luo with multiple identities walks on the edge of black and white, and a riot action is quietly opening the prelude to anti-killing.

In the first round of screening, "Borderline Walker" won praise from the audience for its passionate look and feel of life and death brothers, specific era background, surprising character settings, high-completion Hong Kong-style genre, and shaking national justice, and was named the annual "sin" fried Hong Kong film. As the best crime theme in Hong Kong movies, "Borderline Walker" presents the audience with a late-world era elament based on novel character settings and real historical background, which is a new upgrade of Hong Kong-made crime films.

Liver and gallbladder, Ren Xianqi Ren Dahua interprets deep love, righteousness and brotherhood

The poster of "Brotherhood" released by "Borderline Walker" this time has a Hong Kong-style chronological atmosphere and distinct characters. The police and bandit camp made a collective appearance, and the strong visual impact made people think about the upcoming melee. In the sea of swords and flames, the love of life and death of the rivers and lakes brothers sprang to the surface. Relying on Ah Luo played by Ren Xianqi, many character lines and stories spread out. The two factions of the New Liansheng Brothers Gang and the police elite are intertwined, with black and white positions entwined, and there are many puzzles between good and evil. Where will the brotherhood of the same goal make Ah Luo go?

The poster style of the "Brotherhood" version is retro, and the look and feel of classic Hong Kong-style rivers and lakes films touches the audience’s memories of the times. The fusion of scenes filled with gunsmoke highlights the invaluable value of brotherly love in troubled times. A Luo, played by Ren Xianqi, frowns slightly and is firm and calm, and his aura is full; Lin Yaochang, played by Ren Dahua, is firm and calm, showing the boss’s demeanor; other new Liansheng brothers seem to be rebellious and seem to hold the winning ticket. Fang Zhongxin’s role in the police community and his role as a veteran of the rivers and lakes have created countless possibilities for the plot of the film. The intersection of characters and images makes the brotherly pride of life and death shared incidentally and vividly transmitted. A group of stills released simultaneously also shows the classic temperament of Jianghu films: brothers in troubled times live and die together – gathered into flames, scattered like stars, and every glance of calm eyes seems to convey brotherly love. What mission they undertake in the film and what fate they will lead to are full of associations.

Newly upgraded, multi-identity mystery re-spectrum genre film stunning settings

The background of the story of "Borderline Walker" takes place on the eve of 1997. At present, there are frequent violent incidents caused by the competition for interests. Political and commercial police collude with each other, and money and power transactions are rampant. The film chooses to re-examine that period of time that cannot be extinguished by the torrent of history from the perspective of A Luo. In order to present the black and white distance between chaos more richly and plurally, A Luo has a complex and difficult identity to distinguish between good and evil. The sense of pleasure brought by this layer of identity suspense also won unanimous praise from the audience in the first round of screening: "Until the last moment, it is impossible to judge whether Ren Xianqi’s character is good or evil."

Breaking the bondage of the character setting of the genre film in the touching story of the brothers of life and death is the biggest surprise for the audience in the first round of "Borderline Walker". In the film, the undercover A Luo who infiltrated the gang and the gang leader Lin Yaochang are in love with each other, and Lin Yaochang, who is the eldest brother, also disregards his own safety for the safety of the brothers. A Luo’s high-profile and arrogant manner is refreshing, and Brother Chang, who is dedicated to protecting his brother, is sighing and moving. In the face of traditional rivers and lakes, can the two join hands to win this black and white war? The border between good and evil has become blurred in the chaotic situation. Some people are venal, and some people sacrifice their lives for justice; some people tend to follow the trend, and some people are serious about love and righteousness. Who is black and who is white in the cocoon?

The movie "Edge Walker" will officially hit theaters nationwide on April 15.

Yang Zi’s hand ＂tearing＂ fans has attracted controversy, and fans have become ＂double-edged swords＂ at present.

"Yang Zi against fans" is on the hot search

1905 movie network news On November 2, the topic of "Yang Zi’s fans" hit the hot search list. The cause of the incident was a so-called "Yang Zi fan" who "made wild remarks" on the Internet yesterday. The fan first threatened to "withdraw the circle" (remove the powder), then put forward the suggestion of "protect the susceptible and treat the powder and black with a normal heart" and "learn from Yang Mi" to Yang Zi. Finally, he @Yang Zi himself, pretending that I am really good for you.

Yang Zi fans say they want to remove powder

"I left quietly, just as I came quietly; I waved my sleeves without taking away a cloud." De-powdering should also be clean and not procrastinated. If you love it, you will love it, and if you hate it, you will hate it. Suddenly in your heart. It is really "admirable" that a small fan de-powdering incident can set off such a big storm.

The Yang Zi fan powder removal incident has caused heated debate on the Internet

Coincidentally, Yang Zi often read fan messages and liked to interact with fans online, occasionally appearing in the comment area. This time, Yang Zi "bumped into" the fans, and Yang Zi replied to the fan on Weibo: "With my own hard work, I don’t owe anyone anything, I’m not Qiu Yingying, I’m Yang Zi". Finally, Yang Zi shouted directly: "Hurry up, hurry up, I really can’t offend you, hurt me in the name of loving me, I really can’t afford it".

Yang Zi and fans are fighting each other online

Regarding Yang Zi’s anger against fans, most netizens chose to support Yang Zi, believing that Yang Zi was a true temperament, and the fan was purely a "drama spirit".

Yang Zi’s fans are supported by netizens

Yang Zi, born in 1992, entered the entertainment industry at the age of 7 when she starred in "So Out of the Mountain". In 2002, Wanru in "The Secret History of Xiaozhuang" attracted attention, and then became a well-known child star with "Family with Children". In the past two years, due to her role as Qiu Yingying in "Ode to Joy", she has attracted countless fans and has become a popular actor now.

In fact, it is not uncommon for celebrities to be "harmed" by fans. As early as March this year, an endorsement of Chan Weiting was disrupted by fans. The thing is that Chan Weiting contacted a micro-business endorsement, but did not discuss with his "Queen Fan" beforehand, which caused a large number of fans to be dissatisfied. Fans felt that the brand was "unworthy" of Chan Weiting and belittled the value of Idol. Finally, under pressure from fans, Chan Weiting and his agent decided to cancel the endorsement.

Chan Weiting’s endorsement of WeChat was disrupted by fans

Let’s take a look at the "unstoppable" battle of fans at the beginning.

City fan group refused

Chan’s fans changed to "break the contract immediately" avatars. Also @People’s Daily said the brand was operating illegally.

Chan Weiting fans put on "Break the Contract Now" avatars

There are also fans who want to call the Independent Commission Against Corruption, claiming that Chan Weiting’s agent, Huo Wenxi, has received huge kickbacks.

Fans are going to call the ICAC to report Hovinci

Finally, Hovinci wrote on Weibo: "I sincerely apologize to those who have been affected by the brand cooperation, especially the fans who are worried about supporting and supporting Chan Weiting. I and my team will continue to protect the artists with all our hearts, so that Weiting’s career can be taken to the next level under the love of the majority of fans." The word helpless is revealed between the lines, which shows that fans can expand the influence of artists on the one hand, but also limit the freedom of stars.

Hovinci apologizes to fans

Coincidentally, Song Qian has also been attacked by a celebrity fan in the past two days. Today, Song Qian Studio issued a statement saying: "Recently, Ms. Song Qian has been subjected to organized and deliberate mass dissemination of obscene abuse, rumors and cyber violence. Here, Song Qian Studio issues the following solemn statement on the relevant incident! I hereby warn the relevant Weibo users to immediately delete the content of the corresponding Weibo and eliminate the bad impact of such infringement on Ms. Song Qian. As a public figure, Ms. Song Qian has always borne the tremendous pressure brought about by online public opinion and online misinterpretation, and has always undertaken the obligation to tolerate false remarks, but we must also clarify the boundaries between right and wrong. Ms. Song Qian and the studio resolutely oppose any form of cyber violence!"

Song Qian Studio issued a statement to resist online violence

The reason was that some netizens exposed that Song Qian’s fan group had personally attacked a male star, slandered, spread rumors, and abused a male star online, causing dissatisfaction among the male star’s fans. Then, the male star’s fans responded online, insulting Song Qian and her studio, and the language was very vicious. This is a typical fan "making trouble" to recruit black stars. Finally, from personal black to fan club black, the last two fans started a rip-off battle online, and the star became a victim, putting the stars in an awkward position.

Celebrities and fans "coexist". Celebrities create excellent works and gain the support of fans, and fans can also learn positive energy from celebrities. But when fans interfere too much in the private lives of celebrities, the "love" given by fans becomes "harm", and the two will also fall into a situation of incompatibility. Therefore, fans should pay more attention to the works of celebrities and less attention to their private lives, so that the atmosphere of your circle will be better.

Jolin Tsai explodes, often crying for love, admitting to feeling insecure

　　　　In an interview with a magazine recently, Jolin Tsai admitted that he was insecure and never felt that he could learn enough. He also blew himself up and cried a lot, especially for his feelings: "I think the biggest pressure is not that I am a star, but that two people get along."

　　　　Jolin Tsai. (file picture)

　　　　The Sun reported on March 5 that although the publication of the English book she wrote was delayed, Jolin Tsai still gave magazine interviews as usual, and revealed that she recently fell in love with reading a book called "Happiness", hoping to find the definition of happiness in the book. She said: "I hope to interview ****! Discuss the issue of the universe and reincarnation, how to have a peaceful cultivation." She believes that most people are happy in material things, but she has to go through certain processes to achieve a certain goal before she can feel the happiest. She also admits to being insecure, never feeling that she can’t learn enough, and planning for the worst. Jolin also burst into tears, especially for her feelings: "I think the biggest pressure is not that I am a star, but that two people get along." (Source of this article: The Sun)　

Editor in charge: Li Dan

The top 10 intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　The General Secretary of the Supreme Leader emphasized that "one case is worth a dozen documents," vividly and profoundly explaining the important demonstration and guiding functions of cases. The 10 major intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases released by Chinese courts in 2023 on April 22 cover intellectual property types such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, new plant varieties, anti-unfair competition and monopolies. They involve key core technological innovation, well-known brands at home and abroad, digital economy, seed industry and many other key areas and industries in the new era. They reflect the following characteristics of judicial protection:
　　First, the people’s court grasps the theme of high-quality development, strictly protects scientific and technological innovation achievements, and serves the development of new-quality productive forces.To protect intellectual property rights is to protect innovation, and the people’s courts will step up their efforts to protect innovation and creativity with the power of the rule of law."Danyu No. 405" Infringement Case of New Varieties of Corn Plants,For enterprises that have repeatedly committed deck infringement, repeated infringement, and intentional infringement, punitive compensation shall be applied in accordance with the law, effectively enhancing the confidence of agricultural researchers."Lentinan" Infringement of Technical SecretsThis paper explores the identification of the technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and the compensation for the illegal use of technical secrets, which has positive significance for the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　The second is to actively respond to social concerns and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people.Involved in the "juvenile model" unfair competition dispute case,Responding to society’s concerns about the protection of adolescents, guiding network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors."Basic Funeral Services" Refusal to Trade Dispute CaseThe abuse of market dominance by public enterprises in the funeral industry shall be stopped in accordance with the law, and the interests of the people and small and medium-sized enterprises shall be effectively safeguarded.
　　The third is to explore the adjudication rules in new technologies, new business models, and new fields to serve the new economic drivers.Scientific and technological innovation has spawned new industries, new models, and new driving forces, constantly challenging the existing rules of social life. The people’s courts are facing the dual test of new technologies and new thinking in their trial work. The cases announced this year involve new issues such as copyright protection of navigation electronic map data, illegal data capture, and the prevention of transaction and resale. The people’s courts actively explore adjudication rules, clarify the boundaries of rights and interests protection, and serve the digital economy.
　　Fourth, we should strengthen equal protection and actively create a market-oriented, rule-of-law, and international business environment.exist"Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition case, "Michelin" trademark infringement case, "Lafite" trademark infringement and unfair competition caseThe people’s courts shall equally protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties in accordance with the law, vigorously crack down on the behavior of free-riding near famous brands, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of foreign rights holders in accordance with the law, and promptly respond to foreign investors’ concerns about intellectual property protection.
　　The fifth is to strengthen coordination, strengthen the protection of the entire chain of intellectual property rights, and build a comprehensive protection work pattern.Intellectual property protection is a systematic project that covers a wide range of fields and involves many aspects, from review and authorization, administrative law enforcement, judicial protection to arbitration and mediation, industry self-discipline, and citizen integrity. This requires continuous improvement of the protection system, strengthening coordination and cooperation, and building a large protection pattern. Among the cases released this year, there are both cases of administrative and judicial connection, as well as cases of legal inspection cooperation.Administrative dispute involving invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patentIt clarifies the requirements for the scope, method and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent invalidation, and promotes the unification of administrative law enforcement standards and judicial judgment standards.Judicial punishment case involving malicious litigation of "Changgao Dianxin" trademarkIn addition to punishing the abuse of intellectual property rights in accordance with the law, the people’s courts also transfer the clues of the parties’ suspected abuse of intellectual property rights to the people’s procuratorate, and actively promote the people’s procuratorate to exercise its supervisory functions and make procuratorial suggestions in accordance with the law.
　　In the next step, the people’s courts will adhere to the Supreme Leader’s thought on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era as a guide, continue to deeply practice the Supreme Leader’s thought on the rule of law, focus on fairness and efficiency, and continuously improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property trials in the new era.

The top 10 intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　1. A dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　Second, the case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between a winery and Nanjing Jinmou Wine Industry Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　Administrative dispute case between Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office and Pingmou Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company for invalid invention patent rights [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　IV. Liaoning Danzhiye Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. Infringement of new plant variety rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhiminzhuan No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　V. Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingmin End No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　Six, Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　Eight, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　Case of unfair competition dispute between Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423]
　　Ten, Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd., Tengmou Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]

50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　Intellectual property civil cases
　　(1) Patent ownership, patent infringement, and confirmation of whether it falls within the scope of patent protection
　　1. Zhejiang Jimou Holding Group Co., Ltd. and Weimou Intelligent Travel Technology (Shanghai) joint stock company and other patent application rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin Zhimin Zhuan No. 2436 civil court verdict]
　　2. Beijing Jinmou Security Software Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Mengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Shanghai Higher People’s Court (2022) Shanghai Minzhuan No. 281 civil court verdict]
　　3. Sichuan Huamou Lighting Technology joint stock company and Yangzhou Yumou Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Tibet Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Zangzhi Minzhi No. 1 civil court verdict]
　　4. Jiangsu Jiu high-tech joint stock company and Qidi Qingmou (Shanghai) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement patent dispute case [Qinghai Province Xining City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Qing01 Zhiminchu No. 15 civil court verdict]
　　5. A dispute case between Yanmou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Shimou Group Oumou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to confirm whether it falls within the scope of patent protection [Supreme People’s Court (2023) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　(2) Cases of trademark infringement disputes
　　1. Shanghai Bimou Cosmetics Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Shimou Biological Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 238]
　　2. Dispute over trademark infringement between Namou Co., Ltd. and a shopping store in Shunping County [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme People’s Court Civil Court verdict No. 277]
　　3. Panmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and Sichuan Xinmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 209]
　　4. Mimou Group Headquarters and Shanghai Mimou Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other disputes over trademark infringement and unfair competition [Hubei Higher People’s Court (2022) Erzhimin End No. 190 civil court verdict]
　　5. Dispute over trademark infringement by Limou Co., Ltd., Simou Sporting Goods (China) Co., Ltd. and Nanchang Weimou Industrial Co., Ltd. [Jiangxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Gan Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　6. Bai a joint stock company and a (Tianjin) petrochemical joint stock company infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Higher People’s Court (2023) Jinminzhuan No. 314 civil court verdict]
　　7. Beijing Kuaimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Kuaimou Moving Co., Ltd. Infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Guizhou Higher People’s Court (2023) Qianminzhuan No. 261 civil court verdict]
　　8. Beimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Fucheng Bo Real Estate Intermediary Service Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Hebei Province Hengshui City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ji 11 Minzhuan No. 2075 civil court verdict]
　　9. Binzhou Zhanmou winter jujube brand management joint stock company and Lingwu Fumou jujube industry professional cooperative and other trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute case [Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Yinchuan City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ning 01 Zhiminzhuan No. 8 civil court verdict]
　　(3) Cases of disputes over copyright ownership, copyright infringement, and confirmation of non-infringement of copyright
　　1. Yunnan Yangmou Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Yunmou (Beijing) Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2023) Jingmin Shen No. 215 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Gong Mouping and a research institute, Yang Mouming copyright infringement dispute case [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2022) Lu Minzhuan No. 2685 civil court verdict]
　　3. Wang Mouyu and Hainan Chain Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information online [Sichuan Higher People’s Court (2023) Chuanzhimin End No. 253 civil court verdict]
　　4. Su Sports Culture Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Ai TV Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and a joint stock company of China Electric Heilongjiang Branch infringed on the right of information network dissemination of works [Heilongjiang Higher People’s Court (2023) Heiminzhuan No. 528 civil court verdict]
　　5. Heqing Yang Yinlou Co., Ltd. and Heqing County Eight Original Handmade Silver Store Copyright Ownership and Infringement Dispute Case [Yunnan Higher People’s Court (2022) Yunminzhuan No. 2088 civil court verdict]
　　6. Xinjiang Bimouya Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. and Xinjiang Shenmou Cloud Computing Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information on the work network dispute case [Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Xinminzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　7. Li Moufan, Da’an Yumou Grain Trading Co., Ltd. and Qianguo County Xumou Rice Industry Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Jilin Provincial Higher People’s Court (2023) Ji Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　8. A system joint stock company and a special automobile technology joint stock company infringement of computer software copyright dispute case [Beijing Intellectual Property Court (2021) Beijing 73 Minchu No. 345 civil court verdict]
　　9. Beijing Hongmou Technology Development Co., Ltd. and a general merchandise store in Haikou Longhua and Shanghai Xunmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to distribute works [Hainan Free Trade Port Intellectual Property Court (2021) Qiong 73 Civil court verdict No. 28 in the early days of the People’s Republic of China]
　　10. Zhejiang Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Co., Ltd. confirmed the dispute over non-infringement of copyright [Hangzhou Internet Court (2021) Zhejiang 0192 Minchu No. 10369 civil court verdict, Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 01 Minzhan No. 453 civil court verdict]
　　(4) Cases of unfair competition and monopoly disputes
　　1. Shengmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen Mougang, Yuncheng Jinmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 816 civil court verdict]
　　2. Hubei Huimou Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Zhang Mouyang, Hubei Zhimou Chemical Technology joint stock company infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Hubei Province Wuhan City Intermediate People’s Court (2021) Hubei 01 Zhiminchu No. 334 civil court verdict]
　　3. China Pingmou Life Insurance joint stock company and Linyi City Lanshan District Yunmou advertising design studio commercial slander dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court civil court verdict No. 75]
　　4. Unfair competition dispute case between an association in Tangshan City and an e-commerce company in Changsha Shun [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 76]
　　5. Shenzhen Quanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Mingmou (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. and other unauthorized use of goods with the same or similar decoration that have a certain impact on others [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2023) Lu Minzhuan No. 1035 civil court verdict]
　　6. Tengmou Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Aimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Jiangsu Higher People’s Court (2023) Su Minzhuan No. 280 civil court verdict]
　　7. Unfair competition dispute case between a certain information technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Xiamen Gumou Technology Co., Ltd. [Fujian Higher People’s Court (2022) Minminzhan No. 1871 civil court verdict]
　　8. Nanjing Yuanmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Yuanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Remou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Shaanxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi Zhimin End No. 139 civil court verdict]
　　9. Guilin Lingmou Software Co., Ltd. and Xiaomou Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Xiaomou Mobile Software Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Guiminzhuan No. 196 civil court verdict]
　　10. Unfair competition dispute case between Shenzhen Mayor’s Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and Beijing Tianmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Guangdong 03 Minzhi No. 4897]
　　11. A dispute case between Guomou Technology Holdings Co., Ltd. and Guomou (Dalian) Co., Ltd. in which the unauthorized use of others has a certain impact on the enterprise name [Liaoning Province Dalian Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Liaoning 02 Minzhuan No. 6496 civil court verdict]
　　12. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Damou Brand Planning Co., Ltd. and Jinan Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Chongqing First Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Yu 01 Minchu No. 3538 civil court verdict]
　　13. Unfair competition dispute case between Beijing A Yi Technology Co., Ltd., Hunan A Yi Culture Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Qun A Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict No. 2875, Xiang0105 Minchu, Kaifu District People’s Court, Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　14. Quanzhou Licheng Li Funeral Service Co., Ltd. and Quanzhou Ji Funeral Service Co., Ltd. refused to trade dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin Final No. 242 civil court verdict]
　　15. Ningbo Tongmou Materials Co., Ltd. and Japan Corporation Abuse of Market Dominance Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin End No. 1398 civil court verdict]
　　(5) New plant varieties, technical contract disputes, and judicial punishment cases
　　1. Anhui quan a high-tech seed industry joint stock company and Yuan agricultural high-tech joint stock company and other disputes over infringement of new plant variety rights [Anhui Provincial Higher People’s Court (2022) Anhui Minchu No. 2 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between a research institute in Zhengzhou and Chen Mouqun [Civil court verdict No. 865, Zhiminchu, Henan Province, Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court (2023) ]
　　3. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between Dunhuang A Good Species Co., Ltd., Ulanhot Fengzhiye Co., Ltd., and Hao Moujun [Civil court verdict No. 18, 01 Zhiminchu, Hohhot Intermediate People’s Court, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2023) ]
　　4. Dispute case of infringement of new plant variety rights by Shandong seed industry limited company and big seed industry joint stock company [Lanzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Gansu Province (2021) Gan 01 Zhiminchu No. 51 civil court verdict]
　　5. Wujiaqu City, a new energy technology Co., Ltd. and Luoyang Di Chemical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. technical service contract dispute case [Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Sixth Division Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Bing 06 Minchu No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　6. Monkey Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Changmou International Trade Co., Ltd., and Changmou Technology Co., Ltd. Judicial Punishment Case for Infringement of Trademark Rights and Unfair Competition Disputes [Decision No. 4 of Xiang01 Division, Intermediate People’s Court of Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　II. Intellectual property administrative cases
　　1. Hangzhou Yuanmou medical apparatus Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Hangzhou Zhuomou medical technology Co., Ltd. invalid utility model patent administrative dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 132 administrative court verdict]
　　2. Shanghai Zhanmou Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Minhang District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, Shanghai Minhang District People’s Government Fines and Administrative Reconsideration Case [Shanghai Minhang District People’s Court (2022) Shanghai 0112 Xingchu No. 506 Administrative court verdict]
　　III. Intellectual property criminal cases
　　1. Su Mouqi’s Criminal Case of Copyright Infringement [Criminal Ruling No. 422 of the Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province (2023) ]
　　2. The crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks by Deng Mouguang and Yan Moujiao and the crime of selling counterfeit registered trademarks by Xiao Moucheng, Liu Mouxia and Zhang Mouyan [Shaanxi Province Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi 01 Zhixingchu No. 6 criminal court verdict]
　　3. Hao Mouzhen’s crime of copyright infringement [Criminal court verdict No. 116, Xingchu, Jin 0106, People’s Court of Yingze District, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province]

Brief Introduction to the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　I. Case involving "Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition
　　Case of trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　[Case summary] Ximou Co., Ltd. and Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Ximou Company) are the rights holders of the registered trademarks of "Siemens" and "SIEMENS". The two trademarks are registered on washing machines and other goods. After long-term use and vigorous promotion by Ximou Company, they have already gained a high reputation. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. and other "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd." names to be registered overseas are widely used as commercial logos in the washing machine products, product outer packaging and related publicity activities it produces and sells. Ximou Company believes that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. infringes its exclusive right to use its registered trademark and constitutes unfair competition, so it sued the court. The court of first instance held that the alleged infringement of Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. did not constitute trademark infringement, but constituted unfair competition, and ruled that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. immediately stopped the infringement and compensated 100 million yuan for economic losses and 163,000 yuan for reasonable expenses. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed an appeal. The Supreme People’s Court held that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. knowingly knew the popularity of the "Siemens" and "SIEMENS" trademarks, and deliberately used "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. on washing machine products, causing confusion and misunderstanding among consumers, which constituted trademark infringement; the use of the logo in product packaging and publicity activities also constitutes unfair competition, and should be liable for compensation. Regarding the amount of compensation, although the existing evidence is difficult to determine the actual loss of Ximou Company or the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd., it is sufficient to determine that the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. has obviously exceeded the maximum limit of statutory compensation of 5 million yuan. In this case, considering that Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. refused to provide financial information related to the infringement, which constituted evidence obstruction, the court of first instance referred to the data in the media report that the total annual sales of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. was 1.50 billion yuan, and based on the relevant facts of the case, calculated the sales proportion of the accused infringing products according to one-fifteenth, and then determined that it was not improper for Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. to bear the amount of compensation of 100 million yuan. The Supreme People’s Court ruled: reject the appeal,
　　[Typical significance] The 2nd-round Moderation judgment in this case strictly applies the system of providing evidence and obstructing the infringer who deliberately fails to provide evidence and hinders the people’s court from determining the facts of the case, and makes an unfavorable handling method and judgment in accordance with the law. This case fully reflects the judicial attitude of the people’s court to strictly protect intellectual property rights, and has effectively cracked down on the behavior of maliciously clinging to the goodwill of well-known trademarks, which has played an important role in purifying the market order and creating a good business environment.
　　II. Case involving trademark infringement and unfair competition of "Lafite"
　　Case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between Laimou Winery and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　[Case summary] La Winery is the owner of the "LAFITE" trademark and "CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD" trademark (hereinafter collectively referred to as the trademarks involved), and the two trademarks are registered on alcoholic beverage products. The trademarks involved in the case have a high reputation after long-term use, and "LAFITE" and "Lafite" have established a solid relationship. On April 1, 2005, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. applied for the registration of the "Lafite Manor" trademark on wine and other products. Since then, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and others have used logos such as "Lafite Manor" and "LAFEI MANOR" in the process of producing, importing and selling wine, and have promoted them on websites and trading documents. On December 23, 2016, the Supreme People’s Court issued a retrial judgment in favor of the trademark administrative department to revoke the trademark of "Lafite Manor". Lafite Winery then sued Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants to the court. The court of first instance held that Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants constituted trademark infringement and unfair competition, ordered them to stop infringement, and applied punitive damages. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court held that in the process of applying for registration and using the "Lafite Manor" trademark, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. had malicious intent to cling to the trademark involved in the case of Lafite Winery, and did not have a good faith interest in trust. Its use of the "Lafite Manor" "LAFEI MANOR" logo constituted trademark infringement, and exaggerating the historical heritage and popularity of "Lafite Manor" wine in the publicity constituted false propaganda. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other infringement malice was obvious, and the infringement circumstances were serious. According to the request of Lafite Winery, punitive compensation was applied, and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. for the total economic loss and reasonable expenses of 79.17 million yuan.
　　The judgment in this case points out that trademark registrants who have the intention to cling to their trademarks should not be protected, which is of positive significance for advocating market players to participate in market competition in a sincere and good faith manner, and highlights the strength and determination of the people’s court to severely punish "near famous brands" and "free riders".
　　Administrative disputes involving the invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patents
　　Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company Invalid Patent Administrative Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. is the patentee of the invention patent with patent number 200480036270.2 and the name is "a method for obtaining face images and facial recognition method and system". Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company filed a request for invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. submitted the revised text of the patent claim during the examination of the invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. The State Intellectual Property Office did not accept some of the revised claims. It only made an examination decision based on the accepted part, determined that the patent involved was not creative, and declared all of them invalid. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed a lawsuit with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, but was not supported. Beijing Zhonghao Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed on the grounds that all modified claims should be accepted. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that in the administrative procedure of patent right confirmation, the maximum scope of modification of claims shall not exceed the "scope of information" stipulated in Article 33 of the Patent Law and the "scope of protection" stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 69 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. The review of whether the modification method of a certain claim belongs to "further limitation" shall only be based on whether the modified claim fully contains all the technical features of the modified claim, whether the modified claim adds technical features to the modified claim, and whether the added technical features are recorded in other claims in the original claims. Modifications to claims in administrative procedures for patent right confirmation should generally be limited to responding to the reasons for invalidation; those that reconstruct the reality of the claims in the name of overcoming the defects referred to in the reasons for invalidation may not be accepted. In this case, claims 4 and 7 are essentially the original claims and are the natural basis for examination; the technical solutions citing claims 4 and 7 in the revised claims 8-10 should also be accepted; the revised claims 11 and 12 are not in response to the modification of the reasons for invalidation, and it is not inappropriate for the State Intellectual Property Office not to accept them. Therefore, the judgment revokes the first-instance judgment and the decision to be sued, and the State Intellectual Property Office makes a new decision.
　　[Typical meaning] This case clarifies the requirements for the extent, method, and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation, especially the identification criteria for "further limiting" modification, which is of reference significance for the grasp of the legal standards for modifying claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation.
　　IV. Infringement dispute involving new varieties of corn plants "Danyu No. 405"
　　Liaoning Danye Science and Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. infringed on the right of new plant varieties dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Liaoning Danyu Industrial Technology joint stock company is the owner of the new variety of corn plant "Danyu No. 405". Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. infringed the variety rights of "Danyu No. 405" with the name "Ziguang No. 4" without authorization, and was found to be infringing by an effective judgment in 2015. After that, in 2019 and 2020, it continued to carry out the infringement of producing and selling the "Danyu No. 405" variety under the names "Jinyu 118" "Anyu 13" and "Danyu No. 606" respectively. Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. is the seller of the alleged infringing seeds. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court, requesting that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. stop infringing and jointly compensate a total of 3 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses (with 1.50 million yuan as the compensation base, and 1 times the punitive compensation). The court of first instance held that the calculation base of punitive damages could not be determined, so it applied the statutory compensation judgment Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. stopped infringing and compensated a total of 1 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that the infringement of Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. has a long time, a wide geographical area, and a large scale, and has repeatedly committed deck infringement and repeated infringement. The infringement is intentional and obvious, and the infringement circumstances are bad, so it should bear punitive compensation liability. Refer to the number of "Danyu No. 405" seeds that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. believes can be harvested by breeding 400 mu of infringing seeds and the gross profit on sales, which has basically satisfied the 1.50 million yuan compensation base claimed by Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd., and then according to the compensation base of 1.50 million yuan and 1 times the punitive compensation, the judgment is changed to support the full amount of Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. 3 million yuan lawsuit claim.
　　[Typical meaning] This case makes it clear that the base of punitive compensation can be determined based on the evidence in the case, and cannot simply apply statutory compensation because it is difficult to calculate accurately. The judgment of this case reflects the determination and judicial attitude of the people’s court to fully implement the punitive compensation system, reducing the difficulty of rights holders in accordance with the law, effectively playing the deterrent effect of punitive compensation, and effectively making the infringer pay a heavy price.
　　V. Navigation electronic map copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes
　　Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingminzhuan No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing four science and technology joint stock company began to carry out electronic map research and development and promotion since 2002, and created the 15Q4 Internet electronic map and 16Q2 Internet electronic map (hereinafter collectively referred to as the rights map). In 2013, Beijing four science and technology joint stock company and Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. signed a "cooperation agreement", agreeing to authorize Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. to use the rights map until the end of 2016. Beijing Simou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates claimed that after the contract expired, Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused application software operated by "Baidu Map", "Baidu CarLife" and "Baidu Navigation", which infringed their copyright and constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that the navigation electronic maps used by Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. in the application software constituted copyright infringement, and ordered the company and its affiliates to stop the infringement, apologize, eliminate the impact, and jointly and severally compensate for economic losses of 64.50 million yuan and reasonable expenses of more than 920,000 yuan. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The 2nd-round Moderation of the Beijing Higher People’s Court held that the rights map constitutes a graphic work under the copyright law. For the massive map data, through the comparison of 30 secret notes, 125 internal roads, 47 sea-expanding administrative area maps and 44 model maps provided by the right holder, it can be determined that Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused applications operated after the expiration of the "Cooperation Agreement", infringing the copyright of Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company. In view of the fact that the copyright law has been applied to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the right holder, it is not appropriate to apply Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law for repeated protection. The appeal was dismissed and the original judgment was upheld.
　　[Typical meaning] Data is a key element of the digital economy. This case is a typical case of navigation electronic maps being protected by copyright law. The case not only conducts in-depth analysis of the elements of navigation electronic maps that constitute graphic works, but also makes useful explorations on the substantive similarity comparison of massive map data, highlighting the important role of intellectual property judicial trial services in safeguarding the digital economy.
　　VI. Cases involving unfair competition of "data"
　　Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. is the operator of Sina Weibo. It accused Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. of using malicious technical means to illegally call the server API (application programming interface) to capture a large amount of Weibo data, store and sell it, which constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition and ordered it to compensate 20 million yuan for economic losses and 272,680 yuan for reasonable expenses for rights protection. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held that Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. enjoys the rights and interests of independent control, lawful use and economic benefits of Weibo data held in accordance with laws and regulations. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. illegally calls the Weibo server API to capture a large amount of background data for storage by changing IP (network address), UID (user account number) and other deceptive technical methods, and sells it to unspecified Internet users without processing to make profits. This behavior significantly increases the risk of the Weibo platform being substantially replaced, and may also cause data security issues such as personal privacy and leakage of sensitive information. It violates the principles of fairness, integrity and business ethics, disrupts the competitive order of the data market, seriously damages the legitimate rights and interests of Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and consumers, and constitutes unfair competition as stipulated in Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. According to the median fee standard of 1 yuan/100 times of Guangzhou Jane Information Technology Co., Ltd., its profit is about 2179.79 million yuan. Based on the long duration of the alleged infringement, the huge scale of the call data, and the serious consequences of the damage, it is not improper to fully support the compensation request of Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd., so the judgment rejects the appeal and upholds the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of illegally capturing data for trading and reselling. The judgment is based on the balanced relationship between "strong protection" of data and "orderly circulation", and clarifies the boundaries of data rights protection. It reflects the clear judicial attitude of judicial trials to guide market entities to obtain and use data "in a good way and to a certain extent."
　　Seventh, criminal infringement of medical equipment software copyright
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　[Summary of the case] Since March 2019, defendant Liu Mousheng, for profit purposes, without the permission of copyright holders such as Ximou Medical System Co., Ltd., made dongles to avoid copyright technical protection measures, provided download links such as maintenance manuals, copied software such as Nebula Workstation without authorization, and sold the aforementioned dongles and pirated software through Xianyu account and other channels. Since July 2020, defendant Liu Mousheng instructed defendant Liu to open a Xianyu account to sell dongles and pirated software. During this period, defendant Liu Mousheng was responsible for making dongles, copying pirated software, putting goods on the shelves, sending express deliveries, etc., and defendant Liu was responsible for account customer service, collection, etc. After audit, the sales amounts of defendants Liu Mousheng and Liu were 1.06 million yuan and 140,000 yuan respectively. After identification, it was found that the dongles sold by the two defendants could avoid the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner, and the pirated software sold was essentially the same as the copyright owner’s work. The Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court held that the two defendants, for the purpose of profit, copied and disseminated their works to the public through information networks without the permission of the copyright owner, and deliberately avoided the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner for their works. Defendant Liu Mousheng’s circumstances are particularly serious. Defendant Liu’s circumstances are serious, and their actions have constituted the crime of copyright infringement. In a joint crime, the defendant Liu Mousheng is the principal offender; the defendant Liu is an accessory, and should be given a lighter punishment. Both defendants have confessed to the circumstances and can be given a lighter punishment; if they voluntarily plead guilty and accept the punishment, they can pay a fine in advance before the court, and can be given a lighter punishment. Therefore, the defendant Liu Mousheng was sentenced to three years and two months in prison and fined 700,000 yuan for the crime of copyright infringement; the defendant Liu was sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for one year, and fined 80,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, neither defendant appealed.
　　[Typical significance] This case is a typical criminal case of intentional avoidance of technical measures to infringe copyright after the implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment (XI). The judgment of this case clarified the relevant standards for criminal responsibility for avoidance or destruction of technical measures, fully protected the legitimate rights and interests of medical device software copyright owners, and demonstrated the strength and determination to strengthen the criminal judicial protection of intellectual property rights and serve the innovative development of the digital economy.
　　Eight, "Lentinan" infringement of technical secrets dispute case
　　Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] In 2004, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. signed the "Lentinan Mushroom Polysaccharide Project Cooperation Contract", agreeing that the former would provide the latter with technologies such as the production of Lentinan APIs; the products involved would be sold to the distributor designated by the former; the latter would compensate the former 20 million yuan for distributing it by itself or entrusting others; both parties should keep the technology of this project confidential, otherwise they would compensate according to the above agreement. Later, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. delivered the technical results to Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. as agreed. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. obtained the registration and production approval of Lentinan APIs in 2006. In 2010, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide technology to the outsider for 1 million yuan, and the aforementioned drug production enterprise was changed to the outsider. The outsider’s website publicized in 2014 that the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide API production line was officially put into production, and the annual output value would exceed 100 million yuan. Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court. The Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province held that the technology involved in the case was non-public, valuable, and confidential, and constituted a technical secret. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the technology substantially the same as the aforementioned technology to the outsider, which violated the confidentiality agreement and disclosed the technical secret to the outsider, which constituted infringement. According to the amount of compensation agreed by both parties, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. was sentenced to compensate Nanjing Hanmou Pharm Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case involves the protection of technical secrets of traditional Chinese medicine techniques such as the selection, processing and treatment of authentic shiitake mushroom raw materials. The judgment explores issues such as the identification of technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and compensation for illegal use of technical secrets, which is conducive to the application and development of traditional Chinese medicine technology and promotes the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　Nine, involving "Xiao Ai Classmate" wake-up word unfair competition dispute case
　　Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. released the first artificial intelligence speaker with the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in July 2017, and has since installed an artificial intelligence voice interaction engine using the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in mobile phones, TVs and other products. From August 2017 to June 2020, Chen applied for the registration of 66 trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" in different product categories, and then sent a lawyer’s letter to the affiliated companies of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. to request that it stop infringing its "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark rights, and used the "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark on sports watches, alarm clocks and other products with Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. to jointly publish product promotional articles. Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. argued that the actions of Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so it sued the court. The Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province held that "Xiao Ai Classmate" can be widely used as an influential wake-up word, the name of the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine, and the name of the smart speaker equipped with the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine. Protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen registered a large number of trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" and sent a lawyer’s letter to "stop infringement" to the affiliated enterprises of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which violated the principle of good faith, disrupted the fair market competition order, and damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which is an act of unfair competition regulated by Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. sold goods with the logo of "Xiao Ai Classmate" and released misleading commercial publicity information, which constituted confusion and false propaganda of unfair competition. Therefore, the judgment was immediately stopped, Chen compensated Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. for economic losses and reasonable expenses of 1.20 million yuan, and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. was jointly and severally liable for 250,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, none of the parties appealed.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case involving the protection of the rights and interests of artificial intelligence Keywords Spotting. The judgment of this case not only makes it clear that the use of wake-up words with certain influence belongs to the legitimate rights and interests protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, but also effectively regulates the behavior of maliciously squatting other people’s wake-up words and abusing rights, fully protecting the brand goodwill of technological innovation enterprises.
　　Cases involving "juvenile model" unfair competition
　　Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]
　　[Case Summary] Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. and others have set up "Youth Mode" in the "Tencent Video" and "Tencent NOW Live" APP operated by them. When opening the above APP, a pop-up window prompt will pop up on the homepage. The guardian of the teenager can conveniently open the "Youth Mode". This mode is configured with high-quality content suitable for teenagers, restricts social and consumption functions such as recharging, tipping, and gift giving, and sets up an anti-addiction mechanism. In order to ensure the normal operation of the "Youth Mode", the service agreements of both APPs stipulate that users shall not interfere with or destroy the normal operation of the software, shall not add, delete, or change the functions or operation effects of the software, and shall not implement any behavior that endangers minors. The "anti-advertising tool" APP operated by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. uses the "juvenile mode pop-up box automatic closing" function as a "member exclusive privilege", and guides users to open and use the function in a "free time" way, resulting in users being unable to use "juvenile mode" through the prominent pop-up window prompt popping up on the homepage of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and others believed that Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so they sued the court. The People’s Court of Tianjin Free Trade Zone held that the blocking of "juvenile mode" by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. was essentially an act of unfair competition that hindered and destroyed the normal operation of network products and services of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. on the grounds of technological neutrality to obtain economic benefits, resulting in the failure of the company’s functional design to protect minors, which not only undermined the market order of fair competition and industry ecology, but also violated relevant laws and regulations for the protection of minors, hindered the long-term healthy development of online audio & video, live broadcast and other industries, and constituted unfair competition. Considering that the products of Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. have a greater impact on the adolescent group, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. has a greater subjective fault, and the function of blocking adolescent mode covers a variety of application software. The influence range is wider, the number of downloads is more, and the duration is longer. Factors such as a long time, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 3 million yuan. After the first instance judgment, neither party appealed, and reached a pre-execution settlement.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of blocking "juvenile model" unfair competition. The judge affirmed the positive role of "juvenile model" in safeguarding the rights and interests of minors online, and made a negative evaluation of the blocking of "juvenile model" through the application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and guided network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors.

More comfortable grip, Huawei Ascend P7 National Bank 1899

　　　　(Zhongguancun Online Dongguan Quote) HuaweiAscend P7With an extremely slim body, its thickness is only 6.5mm, and the width of the 68.8mm machine is designed with an ultra-narrow frame and water drop arc, which makes users have a more comfortable grip. At present, this mobile phone (16GB Cool Black/White of Bank of China) is priced at 1899 yuan at the merchant "Changping Good Brothers Mobile Phone Chain".

previous one

Zol

Huawei Ascend P7 (Telecom 4G) is equipped with 5 Studios full high definition LCD display, which has super clear image display. HiSilicon Kirin 910T quad-core processor, stable and smooth operation based on Android 4.4.2 customized Emotion 2.3 operating system, the overall performance is quite excellent

Huawei Ascend P7 (Telecom 4G)
4G network	Telecom TD-LTE
network type	Dual SIM, Dual Pass
Home screen size	5 inch 1920×1080 pixels
CPU model	HiSilicon Kirin 910T
CPU frequency	1.8GHz quad-core
Battery capacity	2500mAh non-removable battery
Rear camera	13 million pixels
Operating System	Android　OS 4.4
RAM capacity	2GB
ROM capacity	16GB
SIM card type	Micro SIM/Nano SIM
Memory Card	Capacity expansion is not supported
Front-facing camera	8 million pixels
Home screen material	LCD material (Incell technology)
Sensor type	CMOS

Worth buying today
Huawei Ascend　P7(Telecom 4G)
[Business name]Changping good brothers mobile phone chain　
[Contact address]Shop B75, Zhenxing Shopping Plaza, Changping Town, Dongguan, Guangdong Province (right side of Daihe general merchandise)　ZolSend the merchant address to the mobile phone.
[Contact information]0769-83823188　　
[Reference price]1899YuanZolBuy online
　

　　　　The above quotations are the actual purchase price, please check the machine carefully when purchasing to ensure the quality, in order to ensure the rights and interests of consumers, if you find that the quotation given by the dealer in this article does not match the text, please call the complaint number 010-82616677-8212 (this phone is dedicated to complaints, and does not accept product consultation or price consultation and other services), we will investigate according to the complaint. Due to the rapid change in product prices, unless otherwise specified, the valid period of this article is 7 days.

For more high-quality market, please pay attention to the official Weibo @Zhongguancun online national market

Ask the author a questionLabel:cell phone

Chen Kexin, Zhou Dongyu, Rong Zishan… How about their new works？

1905 movie network news 2020 is already halfway through, and the good news is getting closer and closer.

In the second quarter, a number of new films were officially filed for approval.

There are such works that have been completed.

There are finished films like "Crime Partners" that will be shown at the film festival;

There are even more works that are being filmed.

Overall, these positive news offer us countless hopes.

According to the public information of the State Film Administration’s filing and project approval in the second quarter of 2020, there are 755 story films in the country, including 630 modern themes (after 49 years) and 125 historical themes (before 49 years).

There are 49 animated films and 32 recorded films in the country. At the same time, among the Sino-foreign co-productions accepted by the Film Bureau, 9 projects were approved.

Overall, the number of filings has increased compared to the last quarter (Quarter 1 2020). So, what movies are we looking forward to in the future movie market?

"Me and My Hometown"

The film "My Hometown and Me" follows the successful model of inviting multiple filmmakers to participate in the creation.

The film is directed by Zhang Yimou, Ning Hao as the general director, Zhang Yibai as the general planner, Xu Zheng, Ning Hao, Yan Fei & Peng Damo, Deng Chao & Yu Baimei, and Chen Sicheng. The five groups will form a director lineup, presenting a relaxed and enjoyable comedy.

Fu Ruoqing, general manager and vice chairperson of China Film joint stock company and chairperson of Huaxia Film Distribution Co., Ltd., has revealed that "Me and My Hometown" will be a film that shows the results of a well-off society in an all-round way.

Compared with last year’s "My Motherland and Me", which focused on history, this new work will presumably also promote patriotism and the Chinese dream in the new era through a more life-like approach.

"Home at One"

After completing the screenwriting of "Winning" and "Winning", Zhang Ji quickly handed over a new work – "Home at One Point".

The film will live broadcast, poverty reduction and other new era cultural elements into one, China film joint stock company general manager, vice chairperson Fu Ruoqing has revealed that the film will show the results of building a well-off society in an all-round way, originally planned to be released in 2020 National Day file.

It is worth noting that another screenwriter of the film, Zhou Yunhai, has participated in Chen Kexin’s production of "Demon Ringling". At the same time, the first producer of the film is the main producer of Chen Kexin’s past works – Jiaying Pictures.

According to the group information exposed on the Internet, Chen Kexin will serve as the producer of the film, and it will be launched in Yunnan in late June. At present, the starring information has not been announced yet.

"Moses on the Plain"

The movie was officially completed in early June.

The film is adapted from the novel of the same name by Shuang Xuetao. The content of the novel is more like a group portrait of Northeast China spanning nearly 20 years from the 1980s and 1990s to the early 21st century, reflecting a corner of Shenyang’s social life at that time.

Zhang Ji, as a rookie director, is quite a challenge.

Fortunately, Shuangxuetao himself served as the artistic director, and director Diao Yinan, who was good at crime suspense films, was in charge of the production. He believed that he could serve everyone with a "peace of mind pill".

Of course, for this movie, casting is also crucial.

According to the current "Reuters", Li Fei’s character is likely to be completed by Zhou Dongyu alone (no young actors will be arranged), which also means that the age span of the roles she needs to play is very large.

Judging from her performance in China, she really interpreted this girly feeling very well.

The same is true for Liu Haoran, who has always been a teenager.

Of course, Zhuang Shu has a 12-year age span in the movie, which poses another acting challenge for him.

"Hua Qiangu"

The film has attracted much attention and skepticism since its inception.

The film is adapted from the drama version, and many people have paid special attention to the casting issue. Previously, some industry insiders broke the news that the heroine was intentionally selected from Guan Xiaotong, Di Lizheba, and others.

Afterwards, it was revealed that the hostess chose to lock in as Zheng Shuang.

For a time, Zheng Shuang’s fans publicly boycotted the project and raised many doubts about it, believing that the "Hua Qiangu" project would not benefit her career. At the same time, fans pointed out that the original novel was suspected of plagiarism and other issues.

Now, there are rumors that the heroine has been replaced by Chen Turin. It is false and true. Who will play the role in the end has to wait for the official announcement.

In the face of various controversies on the Internet, the filmmaker Tang Lijun responded in a long post on Weibo.

According to her, in the main creative lineup, producer Li Jinwen has served as the production director of the film "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" and "Kung Fu", as well as the producer of films such as "Di Renjie’s Tongtian Empire"; director Zhang Chaoli has participated in the "Ip Man", "October Siege", "Journey to the West", "Dear", "Monster Hunt" and other films, and the hit drama "I will wait for you in the future" is also one of his works.

With her long words, the audience hopes that "Hua Qiangu" will be "a high-quality and positive-energy good movie".

"Partners in Crime"

In the recently announced FIRST Youth Film Festival finalists, this "partner in crime" appears in the film list.

The director of the film, Gao Han, is a young director who stands out in the "2018 Penguin Film and Television Green Dream Director Support Program", and director Gao Qunshu is responsible for the production of this film.

"Partners in Crime" was inspired by a kidnapping case.

After 20 years of unremitting efforts, Chen Hanzhong, Dong Feng and his colleagues finally cracked a drug trafficking case covered up by a pyramid scheme organization. They established a strong friendship and witnessed the rapid development of public security criminal investigation technology in our country during the long process of solving the case.

At the same time, the film takes a lot of brushstrokes to describe the northwest environment, projecting the case story and characters’ emotions into the unique temperament of the northwest city.

"Country Girls Basketball Team"

Happy Twist has been very "enthusiastic" in the past six months. Quarter 1 has launched "Attack on Zheng Qian", and this time it has added a new work "Country Girls Basketball Team".

The film takes basketball as the starting point, focusing on a rural teacher and a basketball team composed of rural girls. From the synopsis of the plot, it may be a very inspirational story.

It is worth noting that this time the screenwriting team is not the fixed screenwriting lineup of Happy Twist in the past. One of the screenwriters, Saki Rengui’s past works, are mostly short films with realistic themes.

I wonder if this movie will eventually be an original "happy twist" work, or will it become its transformation work?

"The Boy Who Disappeared in the Old Street"

When "The Boy Who Disappeared in the Old Street" was announced, more viewers may be concerned about the luxury producer group composed of Du Qifeng, Liu Guochang, You Naihai and Zhu Shuyi.

But with the explosion, it may be possible to refocus on this film starring Rong Zishan.

It is understood that the film has been completed, and it was originally planned to meet the audience this year. I don’t know what arrangements will be made in the future.

"When Love"

Let the audience know the female director – Su Lun.

After two years, the new work "When Love" has finally been approved.

From the filing unit, it seems that this time Su Lun did not cooperate with Xu Zheng again, but chose to cooperate with Chen Zhixi, the producer of "Animal World".

At the same time, it can be seen from Tianyancha that the two also jointly founded Sweet Orange Films. I wonder what chemical effects will there be when these two female filmmakers cooperate?

From the perspective of the film’s synopsis, this "When Love", like its predecessor, will still be a female-oriented emotional film.

"Behind the Scenes Winner"

After the "embarrassing" series, Xu Zheng wants to create a "behind-the-scenes" series?

Written by director Ren Pengyuan, "Behind the Scenes Winner" tells the story: Chen Zhijian, as Chief Sales Officer, participates in a business bid, but accidentally falls in love with the female director of a rival company. At the same time, other competitors are also eager. In the face of career and love, he will know where to go.

The most anticipated thing is that this new "behind-the-scenes winner" will continue to feature Xu Zheng as the male lead?

"Goldfinger."

After "Peerless" won both the market and word of mouth, Zhuang Wenqiang finally brought a new work – "Goldfinger".

The story tells that in the 1980s, the Hong Kong-listed company Gali Group went from rise to liquidation in a few years, and its chairperson Cheng Yiyan turned from a shareholder idol to a rat crossing the street. The Independent Commission Against Corruption investigated across borders, evaporating tens of billions of market value, 15 years of investigation, 200 million litigation fees, the entire upper class, and several murders, uncovering the dark scene of the business stage in the British colonial era.

In recent years, anti-corruption works have been well received by the creative market, and the box office of the ICAC series "Anti-Corruption Storm" has been higher than that of the other films. Mak Zhaohui, who co-created "Infernal Affairs" and "Eavesdropping", also directed similar films.

This time, Zhuang Wenqiang also followed in the footsteps of Mak Zhaohui and joined the creation of the ICAC-themed film.

"The Legend of the Condor Hero: Nine Yin and White Bone Claw"

The news that Media Asia Pictures plans to shoot "The Legend of the Condor Hero" has been announced since 2017.

After the changes in the film industry’s internal senior management, the director was also replaced by Zhou Xianyang from the previous Chen Jia, but there was still no progress.

This time, this version of the movie was officially announced to the public, but in this story, the familiar Huang Rong and Guo Jing are no longer the focus, but Mei Chaofeng and Huang Yaoshi are the protagonists, creating a new way and attracting expectations.

"The Shadow Stealer"

The novel The Shadow Stealer is the masterpiece of French writer Marc Levy.

As early as 2016, when he came to China to promote his work, he held a conversation with producer Huang Bin, screenwriter Shi Hang, and others.

At the event, Mr. Huang announced that he was adapting the film, "The Shadow Stealer," which was originally scheduled for release in 2018 and was rumored to feature Mr. Huang and Ms. Zhao.

After many years, this work has not been seen with the audience. After successfully running the movie "The Best of Us", Huang Bin finally put the "Shadow Stealer" project on the itinerary.

How can he localize this French novel and adapt it into a Chinese story? We will wait and see.

In addition, Li Ruijun, the director of "Home in a Plenty of Water and Grass" and "Passing by the Future", has directed the new film "Hidden in Dust and Smoke";

"A Week of Friends" directed by the team of the movie "A Story More Sad Than Sadness";

The movie "First Close Contact" adapted from the novel of the same name by the ruffian Cai and the new work "From 1984" launched by Ning Hao’s "Bad Monkey 72 Movie Project" are also worthy of attention and expectation.

What brand does Lexus belong to？ Which brand does Lexus belong to？

Link Auto is a sub-brand of Geely Automobile.Which brand does it belong toIt is a joint venture between Geely and Volvo. Lectra’s models are01、02、03Wait. withLingke 03For example, it is based on the CMA platform jointly developed by Geely and Volvo, and it is the first sedan model launched by the Lectra brand. In terms of power,Lingke 03It is equipped with a 1.5T direct injection engine with a maximum power of 132kw and a peak torque of 265nm. The transmission system is matched with a 7-speed dual clutch gearbox. In terms of body size,Lingke 03Its length, width and height are 4658mm, 1840mm and 1459mm respectively.

Lingke Automobile is an automobile brand positioning in the middle and high-end market, and its product line is rich, including SUVs, cars and other models. As a sub-brand of Geely Automobile, Link Automobile has been strongly supported by Volvo in design, quality and technology. Linke brand inherits Volvo’s safety technology, comfort and luxury feeling, and integrates it into its own models to create automobile products that meet the needs of modern consumers. Among them,Lingke 01It is the first model launched by the Lectra brand. It is a medium-sized SUV with stylish design and luxurious and comfortable interior. It is equipped with Volvo’s Drive-E series 2.0T engine and has excellent power performance.Lingke 02It is a compact SUV, which adopts the unique design concept of "urban opposition aesthetics" of Lectra brand, with fashionable and dynamic appearance, simple and atmospheric interior, equipped with 1.5T and 2.0T engines and excellent performance. butLingke 03It is the first sedan model launched by the Lectra brand. Its exterior design is fashionable and exquisite, and its interior is luxurious and comfortable. It is equipped with 1.5T and 2.0T engines, with excellent power performance and moderate body size. It is a car suitable for urban driving. On the whole, Link Auto is a young, fashionable and high-quality automobile brand, and its products have high cost performance and are deeply loved by consumers.

Jin Rong Tianyu： The company has indirect supply to Xiaomi su7.

　　() Financial Research Center on April 18th, some investors asked (), did your company supply Xiaomi su7 directly or indirectly? Don’t hide, there is something, there is nothing, this is the obligation that listed companies should disclose.

　　The company replied, hello, the company supplies indirectly, thank you for your attention.

标签归档上海娱乐地图