苏州喝茶服务vx – 上海后花园论坛-上海419论坛-夜上海论坛-阿拉爱上海

A whole industrial chain of ＂getting rich and flowing oil＂

The key to rural revitalization lies in industrial revitalization. How to enlarge the industrial value of traditional farming? In recent years, Huangchi Town, dangtu county has built the whole industrial chain of rapeseed, devoted itself to increasing planting yield, increasing ornamental income and increasing processing efficiency, and achieved the perfect integration of three industries. One rapeseed has achieved a whole industrial chain of "rich oil".

Rapeseed oil upgrade and appreciation

In midsummer, the reporter came to Huangchi Town, dangtu county, and there was a strong smell of rapeseed oil in the air.

"Seven-day pressed rapeseed oil can not only produce strong aroma, but also have good safety, nutrition, color, flavor and shape. The safety and hygiene indicators are better than the national standard, and the quality is better than the national third-grade pressed rapeseed oil standard." In Ma ‘anshan Tianshun Agricultural Science and Technology Company, located in Changfu Village, Huangchi Town, Wang Jun, the young general manager, said that the upgrading of pressing technology has also brought about the appreciation of rapeseed oil. Compared with ordinary rapeseed oil, the premium rate of 7-day pressed rapeseed oil is about 50%.

The 7D rapeseed oil processing production line in front of us was developed by the Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, with a value of more than 2 million yuan. The so-called 7D actually refers to seven original technologies. Fresh rapeseed is poured into the oil-pressing equipment, and after the processes of selection, tempering, aroma production, low-temperature pressing and refining, it becomes rapeseed oil with clear color. Different from other processes of pressing rapeseed oil, the whole process of pressing rapeseed oil for 7 days has no chemical addition and no discharge of three wastes, which is absolutely green and environmentally friendly. Moreover, compared with the traditional oil extraction process, the new 7D process has reduced the working procedures by more than 50%, the energy consumption by more than 20%, and the production cost by more than 30%. The produced functional rapeseed oil is not only safe and nutritious, but also has a retention rate of total phenols, vitamin E and other associated substances of more than 85%.

With this technology, Tianshun Agricultural’s products obtained the national green food certification, and were awarded the top ten famous agricultural products in Maanshan and the gold medal in China Anhui Famous Agricultural Products Fair. Last year, the output of rapeseed oil squeezed by enterprises in 7 days was 466.2 tons, and the output value reached 13.986 million yuan. This year, the output value is expected to achieve double-digit growth.

The rise of "leading" processing enterprises has affected the development of rape planting. Tianshun Agriculture took the lead in setting up the county healthy edible oil association and industrialization consortium, establishing a stable and reliable rapeseed raw material production base, and implementing the production and marketing business model of unified varieties, large-scale production, standardized management and single-receipt, single-storage and single-processing. The company increased the price by 5%-10% based on the market price to ensure the fulfillment of orders and increase the income of farmers in the base. According to the staff of the Agricultural Office of Huangchi Town, this year, the planting area of rapeseed in the town reached 16,000 mu, and the yield per mu of rapeseed reached more than 220 kg, which was 10% higher than the county average.

Pickled cauliflower sprouts sell well all over the country.

In a one-person-high vat, pickled oily Chinese flowering cabbage is silently accumulating umami flavor.

"A large tank is full of one ton." In Maanshan Happy Youth Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., located in Shuanggou Village, Huangchi Town, the general manager Zhi Wei told reporters that the processing capacity of pickled vegetable stems this year has increased from more than 300,000 kilograms last year to 450,000 kilograms, an increase of 40%.

Zhiwei is a native of Shuanggou. After graduating from college, he returned to his hometown and founded Maanshan Happy Youth Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., renting a small site and house in the original village for the processing of oilseed sprouts. Over the past few years, the "Happy Youth" oilseed rape has become a product of online celebrity, selling well all over the country.

"This is called’ dual-purpose vegetable oil’. As long as you master it properly, you can still harvest rapeseed." Agricultural technicians in the town said that in recent years, in order to increase the added value of rape planting, the town has been based on the market, doing dual-purpose "vegetable oil" and demonstrating and promoting the planting of new varieties of "vegetable oil".

"dual-purpose vegetable oil", farmers’ income is one more piece. "In the past, an acre of land in my family was used to collect rapeseed, and 300 kilograms only sold for 900 yuan. Now, only selling oily cauliflower can earn more than 1,000 yuan." Zou Defu, a villager in Shuanggou Village, said.

Root-oil-flowering Chinese cabbage has brought about new changes in rapeseed industry. This year, Happy Youth expanded the existing factory in Shuanggou, built a new Changfu branch, expanded the acquisition scope and improved production efficiency through "cooperation between villages and enterprises". After the plant is put into production, it will provide 10 local jobs and drive more than 200 farmers around. At the same time, it can drive the annual collective economic income growth of Shuanggou Village and Changfu Village to be no less than 95,000 yuan.

Rural tourism is flourishing.

Eco-farmhouse business is booming, and the construction of water villages and homestays is stepping up. Since the beginning of this year, Qiqiao Village has introduced a new mechanism of village-level collective economic partners and started two rural tourism projects in one breath, focusing on the rare rapeseed sea around it.

This year, Tianshun Agriculture held a rape flower festival in the 1,200-mu rape base in Changfu Village, and tourists from Nanjing, Wuhu, Maanshan and Xuancheng came to see the golden land and ocean.

Huinong Grain and Oil Professional Cooperative founded by Li Zhibin, a villager in Yuhe Village, has also initiated and held rape flower festivals many times, which has benefited a lot. At present, there are 430 cooperative members, 50 core members, 24 fixed employees of enterprises and 6.62 million yuan in fixed assets. The cooperative has successively established agricultural socialization service organizations, such as agricultural mechanization operation service team, specialized service team for unified prevention and control, and assured agricultural materials supply station, and realized the integrated services of grain and oil planting and aquaculture before, during and after production.

"The acquisition of 200,000 kilograms of rapeseed this year can produce nearly 70,000 kilograms of fragrant rapeseed oil, which is in short supply." Li Zhibin said that at present, the cooperative’s annual grain and oil processing capacity has increased to 8,500 tons, with an annual sales of 500 tons of grain and more than 200 tons of high-quality crayfish, which has driven the farmers to increase their income by 3,800 yuan per household.

In recent years, Huangchi Town has taken the Rape Flower Festival as the starting point, focused on the integration of agriculture and tourism, took flowers as the medium, made friends at festivals and benefited farmers by traveling, and formed a pattern of rape whole industrial chain integrating production, marketing and integration of primary, secondary and tertiary production. (Wu Liming Zheng Xinru)

Maybach S580 only increases the price in China 850,000, the owner： the landing is 3.90 million half of the province of Rolls-Royce

It is the previous high-end version, which once again refreshes the profit ceiling in the car industry! Because the official guide price of this one has reached 1.54 million-2.488 million yuan, it is already a huge profit to sell according to the guide price. But now it is no longer the S-class it used to be. The entry-level Mercedes-Benz S400L has a displacement of only 2.5T or a low-power tuning. Matching the 48V mild hybrid motor, it only has 313 horsepower + 450 Nm, which is obviously weakened! = Mercedes-Benz S500L and S600L ten years ago, but times have changed, and ultra-luxury brands also need to pay an additional "two luxury car taxes"!

The first luxury car tax: luxury cars with a bare car price of more than 1.30 million yuan need to pay an additional 10% consumption tax!

The second luxury car tax: 4S shop dealers monopolize Maybach sales channels. If you want to buy our Maybach S580, please increase the price by 850,000 yuan, or cash!

Maybach S580 Why increase the price 850,000 yuan? The price increase part can buy a BMW 730Li or 3.0T imported standard wheelbase BMW X5 40i. The reason why the car has increased the price so much is that the monopoly between dealers has raised the price. After all, the dealers who are qualified to sell this car are by no means ordinary people, and the number is very small. Naturally, they can achieve industry monopoly.

Moreover, as long as it is eight-cylinder Japanese cars, German cars are more and more sought after by China’s rich! Because they think this is a market more and more rare, sell a less luxury car, a Toyota non-luxury brand of land patrol 5700 can hype to 1.80 million yuan, not to mention the serious super luxury brand Maybach S580? The car knows 2.488 million yuan, the end point price 850,000, the landing price is nearly 3.90 million yuan.

Even so, there are still many owners that spend 3.90 million to buy this Maybach S580 or Bentley, Rolls-Royce Gusteau, cost-effective much more! Because the Maybach brand is not weak, are the top super luxury brand, the first thing the owner buys is to change the Mercedes-Benz logo to Maybach double M logo, instantly can enhance the 3 million yuan aura.

The foundation is ordinary S-class, but the details are more exquisite and comfortable. Leather multi-function steering wheel, automatic door opening function, 12.3-inch LCD meter and 12.8-inch central control large screen, smooth car machine, independent front and rear air conditioning system, the latest in-car atmosphere lights, rear entertainment audio and video system, man-machine system, especially the absolute top luxury enjoyment in the back of the boss seat.

Bentley, Rolls Royce Gusteau, the rear row is not Maybach S580 comfortable, buy such an expensive car of course, the first requirement is rear comfort. Rolls Royce Bentley Ferrari Bugatti and other brands are still better than Maybach, but they either do not compete, or do not manufacture cars, or the back row is not comparable to Maybach! The most artifact of the car is that the Maybach S580 price increase is too much, close to 4 million yuan landing price is too outrageous.

All over the world, Maybach brand is almost tailor-made for Chinese local tyrants, because more than half of Maybach are all bought by Chinese people, among which Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai local tyrants are particularly enthusiastic! Owner groups believe that Maybach S580 landing price is 3.90 million than Rolls-Royce, Bentley can save half the money, more cost-effective!

The top 10 intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　The General Secretary of the Supreme Leader emphasized that "one case is worth a dozen documents," vividly and profoundly explaining the important demonstration and guiding functions of cases. The 10 major intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases released by Chinese courts in 2023 on April 22 cover intellectual property types such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, new plant varieties, anti-unfair competition and monopolies. They involve key core technological innovation, well-known brands at home and abroad, digital economy, seed industry and many other key areas and industries in the new era. They reflect the following characteristics of judicial protection:
　　First, the people’s court grasps the theme of high-quality development, strictly protects scientific and technological innovation achievements, and serves the development of new-quality productive forces.To protect intellectual property rights is to protect innovation, and the people’s courts will step up their efforts to protect innovation and creativity with the power of the rule of law."Danyu No. 405" Infringement Case of New Varieties of Corn Plants,For enterprises that have repeatedly committed deck infringement, repeated infringement, and intentional infringement, punitive compensation shall be applied in accordance with the law, effectively enhancing the confidence of agricultural researchers."Lentinan" Infringement of Technical SecretsThis paper explores the identification of the technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and the compensation for the illegal use of technical secrets, which has positive significance for the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　The second is to actively respond to social concerns and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people.Involved in the "juvenile model" unfair competition dispute case,Responding to society’s concerns about the protection of adolescents, guiding network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors."Basic Funeral Services" Refusal to Trade Dispute CaseThe abuse of market dominance by public enterprises in the funeral industry shall be stopped in accordance with the law, and the interests of the people and small and medium-sized enterprises shall be effectively safeguarded.
　　The third is to explore the adjudication rules in new technologies, new business models, and new fields to serve the new economic drivers.Scientific and technological innovation has spawned new industries, new models, and new driving forces, constantly challenging the existing rules of social life. The people’s courts are facing the dual test of new technologies and new thinking in their trial work. The cases announced this year involve new issues such as copyright protection of navigation electronic map data, illegal data capture, and the prevention of transaction and resale. The people’s courts actively explore adjudication rules, clarify the boundaries of rights and interests protection, and serve the digital economy.
　　Fourth, we should strengthen equal protection and actively create a market-oriented, rule-of-law, and international business environment.exist"Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition case, "Michelin" trademark infringement case, "Lafite" trademark infringement and unfair competition caseThe people’s courts shall equally protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties in accordance with the law, vigorously crack down on the behavior of free-riding near famous brands, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of foreign rights holders in accordance with the law, and promptly respond to foreign investors’ concerns about intellectual property protection.
　　The fifth is to strengthen coordination, strengthen the protection of the entire chain of intellectual property rights, and build a comprehensive protection work pattern.Intellectual property protection is a systematic project that covers a wide range of fields and involves many aspects, from review and authorization, administrative law enforcement, judicial protection to arbitration and mediation, industry self-discipline, and citizen integrity. This requires continuous improvement of the protection system, strengthening coordination and cooperation, and building a large protection pattern. Among the cases released this year, there are both cases of administrative and judicial connection, as well as cases of legal inspection cooperation.Administrative dispute involving invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patentIt clarifies the requirements for the scope, method and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent invalidation, and promotes the unification of administrative law enforcement standards and judicial judgment standards.Judicial punishment case involving malicious litigation of "Changgao Dianxin" trademarkIn addition to punishing the abuse of intellectual property rights in accordance with the law, the people’s courts also transfer the clues of the parties’ suspected abuse of intellectual property rights to the people’s procuratorate, and actively promote the people’s procuratorate to exercise its supervisory functions and make procuratorial suggestions in accordance with the law.
　　In the next step, the people’s courts will adhere to the Supreme Leader’s thought on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era as a guide, continue to deeply practice the Supreme Leader’s thought on the rule of law, focus on fairness and efficiency, and continuously improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property trials in the new era.

The top 10 intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　1. A dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　Second, the case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between a winery and Nanjing Jinmou Wine Industry Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　Administrative dispute case between Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office and Pingmou Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company for invalid invention patent rights [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　IV. Liaoning Danzhiye Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. Infringement of new plant variety rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhiminzhuan No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　V. Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingmin End No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　Six, Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　Eight, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　Case of unfair competition dispute between Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423]
　　Ten, Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd., Tengmou Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]

50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　Intellectual property civil cases
　　(1) Patent ownership, patent infringement, and confirmation of whether it falls within the scope of patent protection
　　1. Zhejiang Jimou Holding Group Co., Ltd. and Weimou Intelligent Travel Technology (Shanghai) joint stock company and other patent application rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin Zhimin Zhuan No. 2436 civil court verdict]
　　2. Beijing Jinmou Security Software Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Mengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Shanghai Higher People’s Court (2022) Shanghai Minzhuan No. 281 civil court verdict]
　　3. Sichuan Huamou Lighting Technology joint stock company and Yangzhou Yumou Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Tibet Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Zangzhi Minzhi No. 1 civil court verdict]
　　4. Jiangsu Jiu high-tech joint stock company and Qidi Qingmou (Shanghai) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement patent dispute case [Qinghai Province Xining City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Qing01 Zhiminchu No. 15 civil court verdict]
　　5. A dispute case between Yanmou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Shimou Group Oumou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to confirm whether it falls within the scope of patent protection [Supreme People’s Court (2023) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　(2) Cases of trademark infringement disputes
　　1. Shanghai Bimou Cosmetics Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Shimou Biological Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 238]
　　2. Dispute over trademark infringement between Namou Co., Ltd. and a shopping store in Shunping County [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme People’s Court Civil Court verdict No. 277]
　　3. Panmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and Sichuan Xinmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 209]
　　4. Mimou Group Headquarters and Shanghai Mimou Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other disputes over trademark infringement and unfair competition [Hubei Higher People’s Court (2022) Erzhimin End No. 190 civil court verdict]
　　5. Dispute over trademark infringement by Limou Co., Ltd., Simou Sporting Goods (China) Co., Ltd. and Nanchang Weimou Industrial Co., Ltd. [Jiangxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Gan Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　6. Bai a joint stock company and a (Tianjin) petrochemical joint stock company infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Higher People’s Court (2023) Jinminzhuan No. 314 civil court verdict]
　　7. Beijing Kuaimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Kuaimou Moving Co., Ltd. Infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Guizhou Higher People’s Court (2023) Qianminzhuan No. 261 civil court verdict]
　　8. Beimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Fucheng Bo Real Estate Intermediary Service Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Hebei Province Hengshui City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ji 11 Minzhuan No. 2075 civil court verdict]
　　9. Binzhou Zhanmou winter jujube brand management joint stock company and Lingwu Fumou jujube industry professional cooperative and other trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute case [Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Yinchuan City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ning 01 Zhiminzhuan No. 8 civil court verdict]
　　(3) Cases of disputes over copyright ownership, copyright infringement, and confirmation of non-infringement of copyright
　　1. Yunnan Yangmou Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Yunmou (Beijing) Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2023) Jingmin Shen No. 215 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Gong Mouping and a research institute, Yang Mouming copyright infringement dispute case [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2022) Lu Minzhuan No. 2685 civil court verdict]
　　3. Wang Mouyu and Hainan Chain Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information online [Sichuan Higher People’s Court (2023) Chuanzhimin End No. 253 civil court verdict]
　　4. Su Sports Culture Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Ai TV Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and a joint stock company of China Electric Heilongjiang Branch infringed on the right of information network dissemination of works [Heilongjiang Higher People’s Court (2023) Heiminzhuan No. 528 civil court verdict]
　　5. Heqing Yang Yinlou Co., Ltd. and Heqing County Eight Original Handmade Silver Store Copyright Ownership and Infringement Dispute Case [Yunnan Higher People’s Court (2022) Yunminzhuan No. 2088 civil court verdict]
　　6. Xinjiang Bimouya Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. and Xinjiang Shenmou Cloud Computing Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information on the work network dispute case [Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Xinminzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　7. Li Moufan, Da’an Yumou Grain Trading Co., Ltd. and Qianguo County Xumou Rice Industry Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Jilin Provincial Higher People’s Court (2023) Ji Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　8. A system joint stock company and a special automobile technology joint stock company infringement of computer software copyright dispute case [Beijing Intellectual Property Court (2021) Beijing 73 Minchu No. 345 civil court verdict]
　　9. Beijing Hongmou Technology Development Co., Ltd. and a general merchandise store in Haikou Longhua and Shanghai Xunmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to distribute works [Hainan Free Trade Port Intellectual Property Court (2021) Qiong 73 Civil court verdict No. 28 in the early days of the People’s Republic of China]
　　10. Zhejiang Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Co., Ltd. confirmed the dispute over non-infringement of copyright [Hangzhou Internet Court (2021) Zhejiang 0192 Minchu No. 10369 civil court verdict, Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 01 Minzhan No. 453 civil court verdict]
　　(4) Cases of unfair competition and monopoly disputes
　　1. Shengmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen Mougang, Yuncheng Jinmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 816 civil court verdict]
　　2. Hubei Huimou Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Zhang Mouyang, Hubei Zhimou Chemical Technology joint stock company infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Hubei Province Wuhan City Intermediate People’s Court (2021) Hubei 01 Zhiminchu No. 334 civil court verdict]
　　3. China Pingmou Life Insurance joint stock company and Linyi City Lanshan District Yunmou advertising design studio commercial slander dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court civil court verdict No. 75]
　　4. Unfair competition dispute case between an association in Tangshan City and an e-commerce company in Changsha Shun [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 76]
　　5. Shenzhen Quanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Mingmou (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. and other unauthorized use of goods with the same or similar decoration that have a certain impact on others [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2023) Lu Minzhuan No. 1035 civil court verdict]
　　6. Tengmou Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Aimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Jiangsu Higher People’s Court (2023) Su Minzhuan No. 280 civil court verdict]
　　7. Unfair competition dispute case between a certain information technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Xiamen Gumou Technology Co., Ltd. [Fujian Higher People’s Court (2022) Minminzhan No. 1871 civil court verdict]
　　8. Nanjing Yuanmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Yuanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Remou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Shaanxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi Zhimin End No. 139 civil court verdict]
　　9. Guilin Lingmou Software Co., Ltd. and Xiaomou Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Xiaomou Mobile Software Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Guiminzhuan No. 196 civil court verdict]
　　10. Unfair competition dispute case between Shenzhen Mayor’s Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and Beijing Tianmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Guangdong 03 Minzhi No. 4897]
　　11. A dispute case between Guomou Technology Holdings Co., Ltd. and Guomou (Dalian) Co., Ltd. in which the unauthorized use of others has a certain impact on the enterprise name [Liaoning Province Dalian Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Liaoning 02 Minzhuan No. 6496 civil court verdict]
　　12. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Damou Brand Planning Co., Ltd. and Jinan Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Chongqing First Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Yu 01 Minchu No. 3538 civil court verdict]
　　13. Unfair competition dispute case between Beijing A Yi Technology Co., Ltd., Hunan A Yi Culture Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Qun A Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict No. 2875, Xiang0105 Minchu, Kaifu District People’s Court, Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　14. Quanzhou Licheng Li Funeral Service Co., Ltd. and Quanzhou Ji Funeral Service Co., Ltd. refused to trade dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin Final No. 242 civil court verdict]
　　15. Ningbo Tongmou Materials Co., Ltd. and Japan Corporation Abuse of Market Dominance Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin End No. 1398 civil court verdict]
　　(5) New plant varieties, technical contract disputes, and judicial punishment cases
　　1. Anhui quan a high-tech seed industry joint stock company and Yuan agricultural high-tech joint stock company and other disputes over infringement of new plant variety rights [Anhui Provincial Higher People’s Court (2022) Anhui Minchu No. 2 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between a research institute in Zhengzhou and Chen Mouqun [Civil court verdict No. 865, Zhiminchu, Henan Province, Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court (2023) ]
　　3. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between Dunhuang A Good Species Co., Ltd., Ulanhot Fengzhiye Co., Ltd., and Hao Moujun [Civil court verdict No. 18, 01 Zhiminchu, Hohhot Intermediate People’s Court, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2023) ]
　　4. Dispute case of infringement of new plant variety rights by Shandong seed industry limited company and big seed industry joint stock company [Lanzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Gansu Province (2021) Gan 01 Zhiminchu No. 51 civil court verdict]
　　5. Wujiaqu City, a new energy technology Co., Ltd. and Luoyang Di Chemical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. technical service contract dispute case [Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Sixth Division Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Bing 06 Minchu No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　6. Monkey Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Changmou International Trade Co., Ltd., and Changmou Technology Co., Ltd. Judicial Punishment Case for Infringement of Trademark Rights and Unfair Competition Disputes [Decision No. 4 of Xiang01 Division, Intermediate People’s Court of Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　II. Intellectual property administrative cases
　　1. Hangzhou Yuanmou medical apparatus Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Hangzhou Zhuomou medical technology Co., Ltd. invalid utility model patent administrative dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 132 administrative court verdict]
　　2. Shanghai Zhanmou Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Minhang District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, Shanghai Minhang District People’s Government Fines and Administrative Reconsideration Case [Shanghai Minhang District People’s Court (2022) Shanghai 0112 Xingchu No. 506 Administrative court verdict]
　　III. Intellectual property criminal cases
　　1. Su Mouqi’s Criminal Case of Copyright Infringement [Criminal Ruling No. 422 of the Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province (2023) ]
　　2. The crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks by Deng Mouguang and Yan Moujiao and the crime of selling counterfeit registered trademarks by Xiao Moucheng, Liu Mouxia and Zhang Mouyan [Shaanxi Province Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi 01 Zhixingchu No. 6 criminal court verdict]
　　3. Hao Mouzhen’s crime of copyright infringement [Criminal court verdict No. 116, Xingchu, Jin 0106, People’s Court of Yingze District, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province]

Brief Introduction to the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　I. Case involving "Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition
　　Case of trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　[Case summary] Ximou Co., Ltd. and Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Ximou Company) are the rights holders of the registered trademarks of "Siemens" and "SIEMENS". The two trademarks are registered on washing machines and other goods. After long-term use and vigorous promotion by Ximou Company, they have already gained a high reputation. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. and other "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd." names to be registered overseas are widely used as commercial logos in the washing machine products, product outer packaging and related publicity activities it produces and sells. Ximou Company believes that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. infringes its exclusive right to use its registered trademark and constitutes unfair competition, so it sued the court. The court of first instance held that the alleged infringement of Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. did not constitute trademark infringement, but constituted unfair competition, and ruled that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. immediately stopped the infringement and compensated 100 million yuan for economic losses and 163,000 yuan for reasonable expenses. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed an appeal. The Supreme People’s Court held that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. knowingly knew the popularity of the "Siemens" and "SIEMENS" trademarks, and deliberately used "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. on washing machine products, causing confusion and misunderstanding among consumers, which constituted trademark infringement; the use of the logo in product packaging and publicity activities also constitutes unfair competition, and should be liable for compensation. Regarding the amount of compensation, although the existing evidence is difficult to determine the actual loss of Ximou Company or the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd., it is sufficient to determine that the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. has obviously exceeded the maximum limit of statutory compensation of 5 million yuan. In this case, considering that Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. refused to provide financial information related to the infringement, which constituted evidence obstruction, the court of first instance referred to the data in the media report that the total annual sales of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. was 1.50 billion yuan, and based on the relevant facts of the case, calculated the sales proportion of the accused infringing products according to one-fifteenth, and then determined that it was not improper for Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. to bear the amount of compensation of 100 million yuan. The Supreme People’s Court ruled: reject the appeal,
　　[Typical significance] The 2nd-round Moderation judgment in this case strictly applies the system of providing evidence and obstructing the infringer who deliberately fails to provide evidence and hinders the people’s court from determining the facts of the case, and makes an unfavorable handling method and judgment in accordance with the law. This case fully reflects the judicial attitude of the people’s court to strictly protect intellectual property rights, and has effectively cracked down on the behavior of maliciously clinging to the goodwill of well-known trademarks, which has played an important role in purifying the market order and creating a good business environment.
　　II. Case involving trademark infringement and unfair competition of "Lafite"
　　Case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between Laimou Winery and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　[Case summary] La Winery is the owner of the "LAFITE" trademark and "CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD" trademark (hereinafter collectively referred to as the trademarks involved), and the two trademarks are registered on alcoholic beverage products. The trademarks involved in the case have a high reputation after long-term use, and "LAFITE" and "Lafite" have established a solid relationship. On April 1, 2005, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. applied for the registration of the "Lafite Manor" trademark on wine and other products. Since then, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and others have used logos such as "Lafite Manor" and "LAFEI MANOR" in the process of producing, importing and selling wine, and have promoted them on websites and trading documents. On December 23, 2016, the Supreme People’s Court issued a retrial judgment in favor of the trademark administrative department to revoke the trademark of "Lafite Manor". Lafite Winery then sued Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants to the court. The court of first instance held that Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants constituted trademark infringement and unfair competition, ordered them to stop infringement, and applied punitive damages. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court held that in the process of applying for registration and using the "Lafite Manor" trademark, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. had malicious intent to cling to the trademark involved in the case of Lafite Winery, and did not have a good faith interest in trust. Its use of the "Lafite Manor" "LAFEI MANOR" logo constituted trademark infringement, and exaggerating the historical heritage and popularity of "Lafite Manor" wine in the publicity constituted false propaganda. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other infringement malice was obvious, and the infringement circumstances were serious. According to the request of Lafite Winery, punitive compensation was applied, and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. for the total economic loss and reasonable expenses of 79.17 million yuan.
　　The judgment in this case points out that trademark registrants who have the intention to cling to their trademarks should not be protected, which is of positive significance for advocating market players to participate in market competition in a sincere and good faith manner, and highlights the strength and determination of the people’s court to severely punish "near famous brands" and "free riders".
　　Administrative disputes involving the invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patents
　　Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company Invalid Patent Administrative Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. is the patentee of the invention patent with patent number 200480036270.2 and the name is "a method for obtaining face images and facial recognition method and system". Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company filed a request for invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. submitted the revised text of the patent claim during the examination of the invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. The State Intellectual Property Office did not accept some of the revised claims. It only made an examination decision based on the accepted part, determined that the patent involved was not creative, and declared all of them invalid. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed a lawsuit with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, but was not supported. Beijing Zhonghao Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed on the grounds that all modified claims should be accepted. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that in the administrative procedure of patent right confirmation, the maximum scope of modification of claims shall not exceed the "scope of information" stipulated in Article 33 of the Patent Law and the "scope of protection" stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 69 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. The review of whether the modification method of a certain claim belongs to "further limitation" shall only be based on whether the modified claim fully contains all the technical features of the modified claim, whether the modified claim adds technical features to the modified claim, and whether the added technical features are recorded in other claims in the original claims. Modifications to claims in administrative procedures for patent right confirmation should generally be limited to responding to the reasons for invalidation; those that reconstruct the reality of the claims in the name of overcoming the defects referred to in the reasons for invalidation may not be accepted. In this case, claims 4 and 7 are essentially the original claims and are the natural basis for examination; the technical solutions citing claims 4 and 7 in the revised claims 8-10 should also be accepted; the revised claims 11 and 12 are not in response to the modification of the reasons for invalidation, and it is not inappropriate for the State Intellectual Property Office not to accept them. Therefore, the judgment revokes the first-instance judgment and the decision to be sued, and the State Intellectual Property Office makes a new decision.
　　[Typical meaning] This case clarifies the requirements for the extent, method, and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation, especially the identification criteria for "further limiting" modification, which is of reference significance for the grasp of the legal standards for modifying claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation.
　　IV. Infringement dispute involving new varieties of corn plants "Danyu No. 405"
　　Liaoning Danye Science and Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. infringed on the right of new plant varieties dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Liaoning Danyu Industrial Technology joint stock company is the owner of the new variety of corn plant "Danyu No. 405". Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. infringed the variety rights of "Danyu No. 405" with the name "Ziguang No. 4" without authorization, and was found to be infringing by an effective judgment in 2015. After that, in 2019 and 2020, it continued to carry out the infringement of producing and selling the "Danyu No. 405" variety under the names "Jinyu 118" "Anyu 13" and "Danyu No. 606" respectively. Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. is the seller of the alleged infringing seeds. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court, requesting that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. stop infringing and jointly compensate a total of 3 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses (with 1.50 million yuan as the compensation base, and 1 times the punitive compensation). The court of first instance held that the calculation base of punitive damages could not be determined, so it applied the statutory compensation judgment Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. stopped infringing and compensated a total of 1 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that the infringement of Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. has a long time, a wide geographical area, and a large scale, and has repeatedly committed deck infringement and repeated infringement. The infringement is intentional and obvious, and the infringement circumstances are bad, so it should bear punitive compensation liability. Refer to the number of "Danyu No. 405" seeds that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. believes can be harvested by breeding 400 mu of infringing seeds and the gross profit on sales, which has basically satisfied the 1.50 million yuan compensation base claimed by Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd., and then according to the compensation base of 1.50 million yuan and 1 times the punitive compensation, the judgment is changed to support the full amount of Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. 3 million yuan lawsuit claim.
　　[Typical meaning] This case makes it clear that the base of punitive compensation can be determined based on the evidence in the case, and cannot simply apply statutory compensation because it is difficult to calculate accurately. The judgment of this case reflects the determination and judicial attitude of the people’s court to fully implement the punitive compensation system, reducing the difficulty of rights holders in accordance with the law, effectively playing the deterrent effect of punitive compensation, and effectively making the infringer pay a heavy price.
　　V. Navigation electronic map copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes
　　Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingminzhuan No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing four science and technology joint stock company began to carry out electronic map research and development and promotion since 2002, and created the 15Q4 Internet electronic map and 16Q2 Internet electronic map (hereinafter collectively referred to as the rights map). In 2013, Beijing four science and technology joint stock company and Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. signed a "cooperation agreement", agreeing to authorize Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. to use the rights map until the end of 2016. Beijing Simou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates claimed that after the contract expired, Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused application software operated by "Baidu Map", "Baidu CarLife" and "Baidu Navigation", which infringed their copyright and constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that the navigation electronic maps used by Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. in the application software constituted copyright infringement, and ordered the company and its affiliates to stop the infringement, apologize, eliminate the impact, and jointly and severally compensate for economic losses of 64.50 million yuan and reasonable expenses of more than 920,000 yuan. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The 2nd-round Moderation of the Beijing Higher People’s Court held that the rights map constitutes a graphic work under the copyright law. For the massive map data, through the comparison of 30 secret notes, 125 internal roads, 47 sea-expanding administrative area maps and 44 model maps provided by the right holder, it can be determined that Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused applications operated after the expiration of the "Cooperation Agreement", infringing the copyright of Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company. In view of the fact that the copyright law has been applied to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the right holder, it is not appropriate to apply Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law for repeated protection. The appeal was dismissed and the original judgment was upheld.
　　[Typical meaning] Data is a key element of the digital economy. This case is a typical case of navigation electronic maps being protected by copyright law. The case not only conducts in-depth analysis of the elements of navigation electronic maps that constitute graphic works, but also makes useful explorations on the substantive similarity comparison of massive map data, highlighting the important role of intellectual property judicial trial services in safeguarding the digital economy.
　　VI. Cases involving unfair competition of "data"
　　Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. is the operator of Sina Weibo. It accused Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. of using malicious technical means to illegally call the server API (application programming interface) to capture a large amount of Weibo data, store and sell it, which constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition and ordered it to compensate 20 million yuan for economic losses and 272,680 yuan for reasonable expenses for rights protection. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held that Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. enjoys the rights and interests of independent control, lawful use and economic benefits of Weibo data held in accordance with laws and regulations. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. illegally calls the Weibo server API to capture a large amount of background data for storage by changing IP (network address), UID (user account number) and other deceptive technical methods, and sells it to unspecified Internet users without processing to make profits. This behavior significantly increases the risk of the Weibo platform being substantially replaced, and may also cause data security issues such as personal privacy and leakage of sensitive information. It violates the principles of fairness, integrity and business ethics, disrupts the competitive order of the data market, seriously damages the legitimate rights and interests of Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and consumers, and constitutes unfair competition as stipulated in Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. According to the median fee standard of 1 yuan/100 times of Guangzhou Jane Information Technology Co., Ltd., its profit is about 2179.79 million yuan. Based on the long duration of the alleged infringement, the huge scale of the call data, and the serious consequences of the damage, it is not improper to fully support the compensation request of Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd., so the judgment rejects the appeal and upholds the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of illegally capturing data for trading and reselling. The judgment is based on the balanced relationship between "strong protection" of data and "orderly circulation", and clarifies the boundaries of data rights protection. It reflects the clear judicial attitude of judicial trials to guide market entities to obtain and use data "in a good way and to a certain extent."
　　Seventh, criminal infringement of medical equipment software copyright
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　[Summary of the case] Since March 2019, defendant Liu Mousheng, for profit purposes, without the permission of copyright holders such as Ximou Medical System Co., Ltd., made dongles to avoid copyright technical protection measures, provided download links such as maintenance manuals, copied software such as Nebula Workstation without authorization, and sold the aforementioned dongles and pirated software through Xianyu account and other channels. Since July 2020, defendant Liu Mousheng instructed defendant Liu to open a Xianyu account to sell dongles and pirated software. During this period, defendant Liu Mousheng was responsible for making dongles, copying pirated software, putting goods on the shelves, sending express deliveries, etc., and defendant Liu was responsible for account customer service, collection, etc. After audit, the sales amounts of defendants Liu Mousheng and Liu were 1.06 million yuan and 140,000 yuan respectively. After identification, it was found that the dongles sold by the two defendants could avoid the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner, and the pirated software sold was essentially the same as the copyright owner’s work. The Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court held that the two defendants, for the purpose of profit, copied and disseminated their works to the public through information networks without the permission of the copyright owner, and deliberately avoided the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner for their works. Defendant Liu Mousheng’s circumstances are particularly serious. Defendant Liu’s circumstances are serious, and their actions have constituted the crime of copyright infringement. In a joint crime, the defendant Liu Mousheng is the principal offender; the defendant Liu is an accessory, and should be given a lighter punishment. Both defendants have confessed to the circumstances and can be given a lighter punishment; if they voluntarily plead guilty and accept the punishment, they can pay a fine in advance before the court, and can be given a lighter punishment. Therefore, the defendant Liu Mousheng was sentenced to three years and two months in prison and fined 700,000 yuan for the crime of copyright infringement; the defendant Liu was sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for one year, and fined 80,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, neither defendant appealed.
　　[Typical significance] This case is a typical criminal case of intentional avoidance of technical measures to infringe copyright after the implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment (XI). The judgment of this case clarified the relevant standards for criminal responsibility for avoidance or destruction of technical measures, fully protected the legitimate rights and interests of medical device software copyright owners, and demonstrated the strength and determination to strengthen the criminal judicial protection of intellectual property rights and serve the innovative development of the digital economy.
　　Eight, "Lentinan" infringement of technical secrets dispute case
　　Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] In 2004, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. signed the "Lentinan Mushroom Polysaccharide Project Cooperation Contract", agreeing that the former would provide the latter with technologies such as the production of Lentinan APIs; the products involved would be sold to the distributor designated by the former; the latter would compensate the former 20 million yuan for distributing it by itself or entrusting others; both parties should keep the technology of this project confidential, otherwise they would compensate according to the above agreement. Later, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. delivered the technical results to Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. as agreed. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. obtained the registration and production approval of Lentinan APIs in 2006. In 2010, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide technology to the outsider for 1 million yuan, and the aforementioned drug production enterprise was changed to the outsider. The outsider’s website publicized in 2014 that the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide API production line was officially put into production, and the annual output value would exceed 100 million yuan. Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court. The Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province held that the technology involved in the case was non-public, valuable, and confidential, and constituted a technical secret. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the technology substantially the same as the aforementioned technology to the outsider, which violated the confidentiality agreement and disclosed the technical secret to the outsider, which constituted infringement. According to the amount of compensation agreed by both parties, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. was sentenced to compensate Nanjing Hanmou Pharm Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case involves the protection of technical secrets of traditional Chinese medicine techniques such as the selection, processing and treatment of authentic shiitake mushroom raw materials. The judgment explores issues such as the identification of technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and compensation for illegal use of technical secrets, which is conducive to the application and development of traditional Chinese medicine technology and promotes the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　Nine, involving "Xiao Ai Classmate" wake-up word unfair competition dispute case
　　Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. released the first artificial intelligence speaker with the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in July 2017, and has since installed an artificial intelligence voice interaction engine using the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in mobile phones, TVs and other products. From August 2017 to June 2020, Chen applied for the registration of 66 trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" in different product categories, and then sent a lawyer’s letter to the affiliated companies of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. to request that it stop infringing its "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark rights, and used the "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark on sports watches, alarm clocks and other products with Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. to jointly publish product promotional articles. Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. argued that the actions of Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so it sued the court. The Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province held that "Xiao Ai Classmate" can be widely used as an influential wake-up word, the name of the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine, and the name of the smart speaker equipped with the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine. Protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen registered a large number of trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" and sent a lawyer’s letter to "stop infringement" to the affiliated enterprises of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which violated the principle of good faith, disrupted the fair market competition order, and damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which is an act of unfair competition regulated by Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. sold goods with the logo of "Xiao Ai Classmate" and released misleading commercial publicity information, which constituted confusion and false propaganda of unfair competition. Therefore, the judgment was immediately stopped, Chen compensated Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. for economic losses and reasonable expenses of 1.20 million yuan, and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. was jointly and severally liable for 250,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, none of the parties appealed.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case involving the protection of the rights and interests of artificial intelligence Keywords Spotting. The judgment of this case not only makes it clear that the use of wake-up words with certain influence belongs to the legitimate rights and interests protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, but also effectively regulates the behavior of maliciously squatting other people’s wake-up words and abusing rights, fully protecting the brand goodwill of technological innovation enterprises.
　　Cases involving "juvenile model" unfair competition
　　Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]
　　[Case Summary] Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. and others have set up "Youth Mode" in the "Tencent Video" and "Tencent NOW Live" APP operated by them. When opening the above APP, a pop-up window prompt will pop up on the homepage. The guardian of the teenager can conveniently open the "Youth Mode". This mode is configured with high-quality content suitable for teenagers, restricts social and consumption functions such as recharging, tipping, and gift giving, and sets up an anti-addiction mechanism. In order to ensure the normal operation of the "Youth Mode", the service agreements of both APPs stipulate that users shall not interfere with or destroy the normal operation of the software, shall not add, delete, or change the functions or operation effects of the software, and shall not implement any behavior that endangers minors. The "anti-advertising tool" APP operated by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. uses the "juvenile mode pop-up box automatic closing" function as a "member exclusive privilege", and guides users to open and use the function in a "free time" way, resulting in users being unable to use "juvenile mode" through the prominent pop-up window prompt popping up on the homepage of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and others believed that Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so they sued the court. The People’s Court of Tianjin Free Trade Zone held that the blocking of "juvenile mode" by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. was essentially an act of unfair competition that hindered and destroyed the normal operation of network products and services of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. on the grounds of technological neutrality to obtain economic benefits, resulting in the failure of the company’s functional design to protect minors, which not only undermined the market order of fair competition and industry ecology, but also violated relevant laws and regulations for the protection of minors, hindered the long-term healthy development of online audio & video, live broadcast and other industries, and constituted unfair competition. Considering that the products of Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. have a greater impact on the adolescent group, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. has a greater subjective fault, and the function of blocking adolescent mode covers a variety of application software. The influence range is wider, the number of downloads is more, and the duration is longer. Factors such as a long time, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 3 million yuan. After the first instance judgment, neither party appealed, and reached a pre-execution settlement.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of blocking "juvenile model" unfair competition. The judge affirmed the positive role of "juvenile model" in safeguarding the rights and interests of minors online, and made a negative evaluation of the blocking of "juvenile model" through the application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and guided network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors.

Experience in using Xiaomi SU7

Before choosing Xiaomi SU7, I chose Xiaomi SU7 mainly because of its face value and the Xiaomi brand behind Lei Jun.. The appearance of the car is very sporty, especially the electric tail, which is really super cool! After driving for a while, I think the control of the SU7 is excellent, and the intelligent cockpit is particularly convenient.

Main driving experience?
sitting position: The overall sitting posture is low (no seat massage).
field of vision: The seat position is adjusted to the lowest, and the overall angle of view of the hood is very good, so you can easily see the lowest position of the front of the car.
Comfort: I am thin (176cm, 56kg), and the seat wrap is not very strong, but it is not a big problem. In Shenzhen, seat ventilation is just needed, but I seldom use seat massage. I feel that this function is not necessary for me.
NVH performance: I tested it with Apple Watch, and the noise was about 65 decibels (tire pressure 3.0, speed 120).
indisposition When turning, the lateral support reacts slowly, especially in small corners, but the big S corner is ok.

Co-pilot feeling
Summary: There is basically no difference between the seats of the main driver. The main reason is that the seat function is poor, and there are not as many adjustment options as the main driver (no lumbar support adjustment and lateral support). It would be nice if these can be added to the co-driver.
A small problemThe ventilation of the passenger seat will always be on, even if no one is sitting (without turning on the automatic mode), which is quite wasteful. I hope it can be improved through OTA upgrade.

Back row feeling
Summary: My height of 176 is not enough to support my legs, my seat is hard and my backrest is straight. To sum up, it is still poor in the application of family cars, not big sofa seats. For a family car, there is still room for improvement in this part. It doesn’t matter if I drive the coupe personally, and there are very few opportunities to sit in the back row.

Charging performance: There is no problem in reaching 300kw on the 800v platform.

Energy consumption performance: 500 kilometers, energy consumption is 17.7.

Driving experience
Overall evaluation: accurate pointing, hard comfort mode filter, obvious movement adjustment, and road sense transmission in place. The steering is light, the chassis is stable, the low center of gravity provides more driving experience, there are simulated sounds in the sports mode, and the dynamic response is rapid (the tire pressure is 3.0 in the tail position). Track mode has not been experienced yet.

Intelligent cockpit experience
Intelligent driving SR has clear recognition and many models, which can identify the tripod on the ground. Including the action of pedestrians looking back at the car can also be recognized and simulated.

Valet parking
The automatic learning of parking service route can be realized without additional user settings, which reduces the learning time of users. It is very convenient to choose the target parking space and vacant space along the way for parking (Xiaomi’s parking service function supports the creation of a parking lot route with a maximum length of 2km, which is related to the length and has nothing to do with the number of underground parking lots, that is, the route can be supported as long as it is within 2km, no matter how many floors it spans).

NOA
1. NOA in the urban area can’t experience the high-speed NOA yet. It has normal lane-changing and overtaking functions, and can be the first echelon. It is natural to automatically change lanes and overtake at high speed, which is in line with my driving habits. The most obvious perception lies in the exit, and he will judge for himself whether to slow down, overtake or slow down, which is in line with his driving habits.

2. Shortcomings: The automatic parking function is too radical and needs to be adapted. At the same time, there is a possibility that the car butt is facing the post, which needs attention. Now NOA is based on high-precision maps, so when some roads and maps don’t match, NOA will still give priority to maps and make turns. Therefore, opening NOA also needs to keep focused on driving.

Xiao ai tong Xue
Summary: Xiao Ai has a great experience, quick response and comprehensive skills coverage.
1. Xiao Ai can help you operate the functional operation on the car. When you don’t know what you need, just ask Xiao Ai where this setting is and he will open the interface for you and point to this operation button.

2. After the car is interconnected, answer the phone through the mobile phone. After the voice of WeChat, the sound comes from the headrest of the main driver, and it is impossible to use Xiao Ai.

Car machine system
1. The UI of the car is very beautiful and smooth, so I won’t go into details. I don’t understand the purpose of the start button on the car. I can go directly when I get on the car and step on the brakes. I can also go directly when I get off the car and hang the P file. Is there a small partner who understands the use scene of this start button?

2. Xiaomi mobile phone can control the air-conditioned seats and songs in the car on the mobile phone, as shown in the figure.

3. After Xiaomi’s mobile phone is connected with the car (the mobile phone will enter the power-saving mode and the screen will be black), you can wake up the payment code of the mobile phone and sweep it through the car. This is because the toll station and the parking lot reduce the steps of operating the mobile phone. It would be better if you can judge whether to open the payment code and sweep it through the camera outside the car (when the car drives to the toll station, you can open the receipt code by voice, of course, this is based on the fact that you don’t have ETC, or the parking lot doesn’t support ETC payment).

4. Disadvantages: It is connected with Xiaomi’s mobile phone, and it can also "play mobile phone" through the car screen while driving, which has security problems.

Personal deficiency view
1. The rearview mirror without a frame is very beautiful, but instead of adjusting the lens inside the rearview mirror alone, the whole rearview mirror is adjusted together, and there is no rear lateral warning, which sacrifices the convenience of confirming the safe lane change through the rearview mirror. In rainy days, there will indeed be water hanging in the rearview mirror. I will buy some rearview mirror "waterproof film" to try the effect, and I will share it with you later.
2. HUD personally feels a little vague and unclear.

3. When multiple positions are saved in the same driver account, even if the correct driving position is selected, there will be a button that cannot be restored to the driving position next time you get on the bus, and there is also a lack of a button to restore the driving position with one button.
4, start the 360 panorama button is single, only through the camera button at the bottom of the screen.
5. The iOS App can’t view 6 cameras at the same time, and the Xiaomi car App on Xiaomi mobile phone can view 6 cameras at the same time. 6. There is no place to check the temperature outside the car.

summary
I am looking forward to the future use of Xiaomi SU7, and think it is a model with strong potential. From the user’s point of view, although there are some minor problems, the overall experience is very positive. Looking forward to the further improvement brought by future software updates.?

Chen Kexin, Zhou Dongyu, Rong Zishan… How about their new works？

1905 movie network news 2020 is already halfway through, and the good news is getting closer and closer.

In the second quarter, a number of new films were officially filed for approval.

There are such works that have been completed.

There are finished films like "Crime Partners" that will be shown at the film festival;

There are even more works that are being filmed.

Overall, these positive news offer us countless hopes.

According to the public information of the State Film Administration’s filing and project approval in the second quarter of 2020, there are 755 story films in the country, including 630 modern themes (after 49 years) and 125 historical themes (before 49 years).

There are 49 animated films and 32 recorded films in the country. At the same time, among the Sino-foreign co-productions accepted by the Film Bureau, 9 projects were approved.

Overall, the number of filings has increased compared to the last quarter (Quarter 1 2020). So, what movies are we looking forward to in the future movie market?

"Me and My Hometown"

The film "My Hometown and Me" follows the successful model of inviting multiple filmmakers to participate in the creation.

The film is directed by Zhang Yimou, Ning Hao as the general director, Zhang Yibai as the general planner, Xu Zheng, Ning Hao, Yan Fei & Peng Damo, Deng Chao & Yu Baimei, and Chen Sicheng. The five groups will form a director lineup, presenting a relaxed and enjoyable comedy.

Fu Ruoqing, general manager and vice chairperson of China Film joint stock company and chairperson of Huaxia Film Distribution Co., Ltd., has revealed that "Me and My Hometown" will be a film that shows the results of a well-off society in an all-round way.

Compared with last year’s "My Motherland and Me", which focused on history, this new work will presumably also promote patriotism and the Chinese dream in the new era through a more life-like approach.

"Home at One"

After completing the screenwriting of "Winning" and "Winning", Zhang Ji quickly handed over a new work – "Home at One Point".

The film will live broadcast, poverty reduction and other new era cultural elements into one, China film joint stock company general manager, vice chairperson Fu Ruoqing has revealed that the film will show the results of building a well-off society in an all-round way, originally planned to be released in 2020 National Day file.

It is worth noting that another screenwriter of the film, Zhou Yunhai, has participated in Chen Kexin’s production of "Demon Ringling". At the same time, the first producer of the film is the main producer of Chen Kexin’s past works – Jiaying Pictures.

According to the group information exposed on the Internet, Chen Kexin will serve as the producer of the film, and it will be launched in Yunnan in late June. At present, the starring information has not been announced yet.

"Moses on the Plain"

The movie was officially completed in early June.

The film is adapted from the novel of the same name by Shuang Xuetao. The content of the novel is more like a group portrait of Northeast China spanning nearly 20 years from the 1980s and 1990s to the early 21st century, reflecting a corner of Shenyang’s social life at that time.

Zhang Ji, as a rookie director, is quite a challenge.

Fortunately, Shuangxuetao himself served as the artistic director, and director Diao Yinan, who was good at crime suspense films, was in charge of the production. He believed that he could serve everyone with a "peace of mind pill".

Of course, for this movie, casting is also crucial.

According to the current "Reuters", Li Fei’s character is likely to be completed by Zhou Dongyu alone (no young actors will be arranged), which also means that the age span of the roles she needs to play is very large.

Judging from her performance in China, she really interpreted this girly feeling very well.

The same is true for Liu Haoran, who has always been a teenager.

Of course, Zhuang Shu has a 12-year age span in the movie, which poses another acting challenge for him.

"Hua Qiangu"

The film has attracted much attention and skepticism since its inception.

The film is adapted from the drama version, and many people have paid special attention to the casting issue. Previously, some industry insiders broke the news that the heroine was intentionally selected from Guan Xiaotong, Di Lizheba, and others.

Afterwards, it was revealed that the hostess chose to lock in as Zheng Shuang.

For a time, Zheng Shuang’s fans publicly boycotted the project and raised many doubts about it, believing that the "Hua Qiangu" project would not benefit her career. At the same time, fans pointed out that the original novel was suspected of plagiarism and other issues.

Now, there are rumors that the heroine has been replaced by Chen Turin. It is false and true. Who will play the role in the end has to wait for the official announcement.

In the face of various controversies on the Internet, the filmmaker Tang Lijun responded in a long post on Weibo.

According to her, in the main creative lineup, producer Li Jinwen has served as the production director of the film "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" and "Kung Fu", as well as the producer of films such as "Di Renjie’s Tongtian Empire"; director Zhang Chaoli has participated in the "Ip Man", "October Siege", "Journey to the West", "Dear", "Monster Hunt" and other films, and the hit drama "I will wait for you in the future" is also one of his works.

With her long words, the audience hopes that "Hua Qiangu" will be "a high-quality and positive-energy good movie".

"Partners in Crime"

In the recently announced FIRST Youth Film Festival finalists, this "partner in crime" appears in the film list.

The director of the film, Gao Han, is a young director who stands out in the "2018 Penguin Film and Television Green Dream Director Support Program", and director Gao Qunshu is responsible for the production of this film.

"Partners in Crime" was inspired by a kidnapping case.

After 20 years of unremitting efforts, Chen Hanzhong, Dong Feng and his colleagues finally cracked a drug trafficking case covered up by a pyramid scheme organization. They established a strong friendship and witnessed the rapid development of public security criminal investigation technology in our country during the long process of solving the case.

At the same time, the film takes a lot of brushstrokes to describe the northwest environment, projecting the case story and characters’ emotions into the unique temperament of the northwest city.

"Country Girls Basketball Team"

Happy Twist has been very "enthusiastic" in the past six months. Quarter 1 has launched "Attack on Zheng Qian", and this time it has added a new work "Country Girls Basketball Team".

The film takes basketball as the starting point, focusing on a rural teacher and a basketball team composed of rural girls. From the synopsis of the plot, it may be a very inspirational story.

It is worth noting that this time the screenwriting team is not the fixed screenwriting lineup of Happy Twist in the past. One of the screenwriters, Saki Rengui’s past works, are mostly short films with realistic themes.

I wonder if this movie will eventually be an original "happy twist" work, or will it become its transformation work?

"The Boy Who Disappeared in the Old Street"

When "The Boy Who Disappeared in the Old Street" was announced, more viewers may be concerned about the luxury producer group composed of Du Qifeng, Liu Guochang, You Naihai and Zhu Shuyi.

But with the explosion, it may be possible to refocus on this film starring Rong Zishan.

It is understood that the film has been completed, and it was originally planned to meet the audience this year. I don’t know what arrangements will be made in the future.

"When Love"

Let the audience know the female director – Su Lun.

After two years, the new work "When Love" has finally been approved.

From the filing unit, it seems that this time Su Lun did not cooperate with Xu Zheng again, but chose to cooperate with Chen Zhixi, the producer of "Animal World".

At the same time, it can be seen from Tianyancha that the two also jointly founded Sweet Orange Films. I wonder what chemical effects will there be when these two female filmmakers cooperate?

From the perspective of the film’s synopsis, this "When Love", like its predecessor, will still be a female-oriented emotional film.

"Behind the Scenes Winner"

After the "embarrassing" series, Xu Zheng wants to create a "behind-the-scenes" series?

Written by director Ren Pengyuan, "Behind the Scenes Winner" tells the story: Chen Zhijian, as Chief Sales Officer, participates in a business bid, but accidentally falls in love with the female director of a rival company. At the same time, other competitors are also eager. In the face of career and love, he will know where to go.

The most anticipated thing is that this new "behind-the-scenes winner" will continue to feature Xu Zheng as the male lead?

"Goldfinger."

After "Peerless" won both the market and word of mouth, Zhuang Wenqiang finally brought a new work – "Goldfinger".

The story tells that in the 1980s, the Hong Kong-listed company Gali Group went from rise to liquidation in a few years, and its chairperson Cheng Yiyan turned from a shareholder idol to a rat crossing the street. The Independent Commission Against Corruption investigated across borders, evaporating tens of billions of market value, 15 years of investigation, 200 million litigation fees, the entire upper class, and several murders, uncovering the dark scene of the business stage in the British colonial era.

In recent years, anti-corruption works have been well received by the creative market, and the box office of the ICAC series "Anti-Corruption Storm" has been higher than that of the other films. Mak Zhaohui, who co-created "Infernal Affairs" and "Eavesdropping", also directed similar films.

This time, Zhuang Wenqiang also followed in the footsteps of Mak Zhaohui and joined the creation of the ICAC-themed film.

"The Legend of the Condor Hero: Nine Yin and White Bone Claw"

The news that Media Asia Pictures plans to shoot "The Legend of the Condor Hero" has been announced since 2017.

After the changes in the film industry’s internal senior management, the director was also replaced by Zhou Xianyang from the previous Chen Jia, but there was still no progress.

This time, this version of the movie was officially announced to the public, but in this story, the familiar Huang Rong and Guo Jing are no longer the focus, but Mei Chaofeng and Huang Yaoshi are the protagonists, creating a new way and attracting expectations.

"The Shadow Stealer"

The novel The Shadow Stealer is the masterpiece of French writer Marc Levy.

As early as 2016, when he came to China to promote his work, he held a conversation with producer Huang Bin, screenwriter Shi Hang, and others.

At the event, Mr. Huang announced that he was adapting the film, "The Shadow Stealer," which was originally scheduled for release in 2018 and was rumored to feature Mr. Huang and Ms. Zhao.

After many years, this work has not been seen with the audience. After successfully running the movie "The Best of Us", Huang Bin finally put the "Shadow Stealer" project on the itinerary.

How can he localize this French novel and adapt it into a Chinese story? We will wait and see.

In addition, Li Ruijun, the director of "Home in a Plenty of Water and Grass" and "Passing by the Future", has directed the new film "Hidden in Dust and Smoke";

"A Week of Friends" directed by the team of the movie "A Story More Sad Than Sadness";

The movie "First Close Contact" adapted from the novel of the same name by the ruffian Cai and the new work "From 1984" launched by Ning Hao’s "Bad Monkey 72 Movie Project" are also worthy of attention and expectation.

Are highly educated front-line workers a waste of academic qualifications？ What does delivery have to do with academic qualifications？

　　"Fate has knocked me down, but it can never defeat me. So what about you, young man, are you going to stop here?" The text is from a short video posted by Mo Mingyong, a doctoral student at Tsinghua University. In the video, Mo Mingyong, wearing a takeaway suit and holding a student ID, stands at the gate of Qinghua Garden, his face brimming with youth.

　　After the video was released, it received more than 1.85 million of likes in a short period of time. Some netizens praised him for using his actions to interpret "self-improvement and good virtue". However, some people accused him of earning traffic in sad-fishing.

　　Mo Mingyong had to respond to this, and a period of ups and downs in his life was revealed. It turned out that the delivery of food took place before he was admitted to the doctorate. Due to the millions of yuan in debt after the failure of his business, Mo Mingyong registered as a delivery rider at the end of 2021 to collect tuition fees and ease financial difficulties.

　　"It wasn’t the people from Tsinghua who went to deliver food, but the people who delivered food went to Tsinghua." As Mo Mingyong repeatedly emphasized, the focus of this story should be why he delivered food, not the label of academic qualifications. Most people didn’t have time to understand the truth, and based on the combination of "academic qualifications + takeaway", they sensitively questioned or even accused him of wasting academic qualifications and making a sad-fishing show. This is not a distinction between three, six and nine in their hearts.

　　In fact, Mo Mingyong not only has a PhD from Tsinghua University, but also graduated from the London School of Economics. During difficult times, he not only delivered food, but also sold English classes online.

　　It should be seen that food delivery is a way for this young man who failed to start a business to get through the low point of life. When encountering difficulties, he was not discouraged or evaded. With his ability and perseverance, he tried his best to fulfill the contract and repay the debt, but still did not give up improving his education. What shines in this story is Mo Mingyong’s inspirational attitude towards life.

　　This attitude is not uncommon among young people.

　　Zhengzhou, Henan, 26-year-old Gao Shuaiqi encountered his family’s illness during the postgraduate entrance examination. In order to support his family’s burden and his own dreams, he reviewed while delivering takeout, and finally received the postgraduate admission letter; Lishui, Zhejiang, 18-year-old girl Xu Zhuoyu took the part-time delivery after the college entrance examination. She realized the hard work of making money, and bluntly said that she had become "stingy" when she became black…

　　For the protagonists in these "education + takeaway" stories, in addition to earning financial income, takeaway delivery also has more personal color: some people use it as a spiritual support, some use it as a "life-saving straw", and some use it as a labor experience… Their goals and starting points may be different, but it should be noted that this does not mean that they have no other options, let alone that they are wasting their academic qualifications in this position.

　　Delivering food is nothing more than a job. To be able to do this job well, to be recognized by others, and to experience the happiness and solidity brought by labor, is it not a kind of harvest? Even if you switch to other industries in the future, is the past experience not a kind of precipitation of life and spiritual nourishment? In this sense, education is not a limiting shackle or a dazzling label, but a key to help them open their horizons and experience life.

　　Those who blame highly educated front-line workers for wasting their academic qualifications and making a sad-fishing show can rest easy.

Paris Olympic volleyball qualifying group： China women’s volleyball team is in the same group as seven teams including Serbia.

According to CCTV sports news, on March 17, Beijing time, the results of the group lottery for the volleyball qualifying match of the Paris Olympic Games were released. China women’s volleyball team is in the same group as seven teams including Serbia and Dominica. The specific grouping situation is as follows:

China Men’s Volleyball Team is in the same group with seven teams including Poland and Argentina. The specific grouping situation is as follows:

According to the qualification allocation scheme of volleyball in Paris Olympic Games, there are 12 teams in women’s and men’s indoor volleyball. France, the host country, will automatically qualify for the competition, and the remaining teams will be selected through Olympic qualifiers and world rankings.

There are 24 teams in men’s and women’s volleyball teams participating in the Olympic qualifiers. Women’s Volleyball Qualifying Tournaments will be held in China, Japan and Poland from September 16th to 24th. Twenty-four teams will be divided into three groups, with 8 teams in each group playing single round robin, and the top two teams will qualify for the Olympic Games. Six Olympic seats will be produced at this stage.

The other five Olympic seats will be distributed according to the ranking after the 2024 World Women’s Volleyball League. If there is a continent that fails to qualify for the Olympic Games in the first stage, the team with the highest ranking on that continent will get a seat first; The remaining seats will be distributed according to the world rankings.

The competition system of men’s volleyball is the same as that of women’s volleyball. The competition will be held in China, Japan and Brazil from September 30th to October 8th.

Editor Li Jiarong

Reporting/feedback

A variety of power, plug-in version of pure battery life of 100km! New Golf Family Official Map Released

Recently, Volkswagen released the exterior map of the new golf family. This new car is a mid-term modified model, offering a variety of power systems and body forms, including standard version, high-performance GTI model, plug-in hybrid GTE model and station wagon Variant.

From the appearance, the new car adopts brand-new design elements. The headlight group has been changed into a single light source, equipped with a penetrating light strip, and at the same time, there is a luminous Volkswagen LOGO on the lower side. The front enclosure has been redesigned to be more dynamic, and the left front fender is equipped with a charging interface, suggesting that the car may be a plug-in hybrid version.

In addition, in terms of color, the new car has added four new color options: crystal ice blue, anemone blue, oyster silver and black ebony, and provided five wheels with different sizes ranging from 16 inches to 19 inches to choose from. Some models can also be equipped with a two-color body with a black roof.

For the interior, the new car is equipped with a brand-new MIB4 intelligent entertainment system. The control panel of the low version is 10.4 inches, and the high version is 12.9 inches; The air conditioning control system has also been completely redesigned, using the touch slider to replace the traditional physical buttons.

In terms of power system, the new Golf will provide a 1.5T turbocharged gasoline engine, a 1.5eTSI twin-vortex turbocharged diesel engine, a 2.0T turbocharged gasoline engine and a 1.5T plug-in hybrid version. According to different vehicle configurations, the new car is matched with different types of transmissions such as 6-speed manual transmission and 7-speed powershift.

The battery capacity of the plug-in hybrid version has been increased from 10.6kWh to 19.7kWh, making its pure electric cruising range reach 100 kilometers. In addition, the car supports AC charging (maximum power is 11 kW) and DC fast charging (maximum power is 50 kW).

Hubei’s ice and snow tourism has become a hot spot for cultural tourism consumption during the New Year holiday.

Wuhan, Wuhan, December 31 (Reporter Zhang Zhuo trainee reporter Zhao Ling correspondent Ewen Travel) During the New Year’s Day, the curtain of winter tourism in Hubei slowly opened, and ice and snow tours became a "hot" choice for winter. The weather is fine on New Year’s Day holiday this year, which is suitable for tourists to travel. Hubei has a variety of ice and snow sports venues, allowing tourists to enjoy skiing, enjoying snow and playing with snow, and enjoying close contact with snow and ice. It is estimated that about 100,000 tourists will participate in skiing and playing with snow.

In order to meet the needs of tourists, Hubei has continuously enriched the winter tourism products mainly based on skiing. Visitors can fully experience the characteristics of Hubei winter tourism in Shennongjia, Yichang, Huanggang and Xianning, and have a beautiful encounter with ice and snow.

Shennongjia has made great efforts to build a big IP for ice and snow, enriching the format and increasing the experience with night skating products, promoting the culture of ice and snow sports, and letting more people know and experience the fun of ice and snow sports. According to statistics, two days before New Year’s Day, Shennongjia International, Zhonghe and Longjiangping ski resorts received a total of 15,000 tourists, an increase of 129.1% compared with the same period of New Year’s Day in 2023.

Huanggang City held the 7th Hubei Yingshan Hot Spring Skiing Festival "Dream Back to Datang and Meet Bi Sheng Millennium Tangquan Frozen", which received 14,000 tourists in a single day. Enshi Badong Lvcongpo Ski Resort received 5100 people. Xianning Jihua Ice and Snow Xiangcheng Ski Museum received 3330 tourists.

In addition, Hubei Province is rich in all kinds of ice and snow activities. During New Year’s Day, Shennongjia International Ski Resort took "Skiing with Olympic Champion" as the theme, allowing tourists to play around Shennongjia International Ski Resort with Olympic Champion Liao Hui, and at the same time holding the activity of "Cultural Travel Vouchers to Help Study", which attracted more than a thousand students who came to study skiing in winter. Wuhan East Lake Scenic Area has launched 6,000 square meters of "Looking for the Ice and Snow Egg Island", covering eight major snow-themed games such as snowball fights, ice dragon boat races and ice sculpture exhibitions, so that tourists can have a "snow addiction" during the New Year holiday; Liuzhuya Scenic Area in Baokang, Xiangyang held the 2023 Ice and Snow Tourism Festival and the "Winter Tour in Baokang" activity, and promoted the ice and snow tourism in Baokang through on-site promotion, folk programs and ski performances.

In recent years, Hubei cultural tourism department and sports department have made joint efforts to implement the "North Snow South Exhibition" project, actively promote mass ice and snow sports and guide ice and snow consumption. At present, there are 18 ski resorts officially operating in the province. In the early stage, Hubei issued the "Welcome to the Dragon Year, Welcome to Hubei in Winter Fun" 2023 Hubei Winter Tourism Consumption Season Preferential Policy Gift Package, Shennongjia launched the 18th Ice and Snow Festival, and Yichang launched a series of activities such as "Hot Snow Boils, It’s Appropriate to Start-Yichang’s First Popular Ice and Snow Season", which added color to the ice and snow tour during the New Year holiday.

For more exciting information, please download the "Yangguang. com" client in the application market. Welcome to provide news clues, 24-hour hotline 400-800-0088; Consumers can also complain online through the "Woodpecker Consumer Complaint Platform" of the Central Broadcasting Network. Copyright statement: The copyright of this article belongs to Yangguang. com and may not be reproduced without authorization. Reprint please contact: cnrbanquan@cnr.cn, we will be held accountable for the behavior that does not respect originality.

Reporting/feedback

International Football League Cup Comprehensive： Arsenal and Manchester United missed the quarter-finals.

Xinhua News Agency, London, November 1st (Reporter Zhang Wei) Arsenal and Manchester United both lost to opponents from the same Premier League on the 1st, and missed the quarterfinals of the English League Cup.

Arsenal played against West Ham United in London on the same day, and fell behind in the first half because of White’s careless own goal. "Arsenal" coach arteta bluntly said after the game that the ball directly influenced the development direction of the game. Since then, Arsenal, which has an absolute advantage in possession of the ball, has never been able to make a breakthrough. On the contrary, Kaddos added another point five minutes after the West Ham United Easy Side, extending the lead to 2-0. In the 60th minute, Bowen hit a long-range shot outside the penalty area. It wasn’t until the final stoppage time that Arsenal were pulled back by substitute Odegard, and the score was fixed at 1-3.

On November 1st, Arsenal coach Arteta looked depressed after the game. Xinhua News Agency/Reuters

Manchester United, who just suffered a home defeat in the Manchester derby last weekend, continued to sink at Old Trafford. Against Newcastle United, they conceded two goals in a row in the first half. In the 60th minute, Willock got rid of the defense with the ball in the frontcourt and hit the door to help the Magpie achieve a 3-0 victory.

Newcastle, who lost to the "Red Devils" in the Carling Cup final last season, took revenge, and their quarter-final opponent will be Chelsea who beat Blackburn 2-0 on the same day.

In addition, Liverpool beat Bournemouth 2-1 with goals from Gakpo and Nunez, and the quarterfinals will face West Ham United.

标签归档苏州喝茶服务vx